That's weird, I was told by two other sources that that would be sufficient, not to mention that someone suggested I use that CPU in these very forums, along with the video card I wanted. In fact, the video card I want plays at about 70 FPS on a resolution higher than mine, so where's your proof that it won't work?
EDIT: Make that three sources that confirm that the E5200 will run UT3, at least overclocked. So screw Core 2 Duo. Guess who was wrong? That's right! FuLLBLeeD! Oh, and Dark Pulse.
EDIT2: Oh, I see why you guys thought the E5200 wouldn't run UT3, you assumed I had one of those oversized monitors. I have a monitor that is 1024x768. That's tiny compared to you guys with monster computers, and will definitely present no problem for the CPU.
Uhh... no, I'm not wrong. Allow me to break it down.
- The E5200 is a Pentium Dual Core. That helps UT3 tremendously, since it is, after all, two CPUs.
- The catch is they are neutered in the Cache department. That E5200 has about 2 MB Cache, and runs at a bus speed of 800 MHz. Generally speaking, for every 2 MB increase in cache, you can expect about 10-15 more FPS. Higher FSBs also mean it can shove more data around, which translates to... more FPS.
- Less cache = more that the game has to potentially read off your (much slower) main memory or - worse - your hard drives if your memory is low. That equals stutters and swapping.
I never said it wouldn't run, I said it sucked for running the game. And it does. It's a slight step up from your Celeron D, to be granted - you're going from 512k L2 Cache to 2 MB, and of course, one CPU to two. The fact of the matter is that UT3 will still stress that system hard, and the lowered cache and FSB is going to rather severely affect your FPS compared to a slightly pricier Core 2 Duo.
Also, that 70 FPS figure is under best conditions. Trust me... you're not always getting best conditions. Especially when stuff's whizzing around. Also, if your videocard isn't up to snuff, that will be the bottleneck and no matter what the performance will still be under that.
Also, if you have less than 2 GB of RAM, don't even bet on playing UT3 at the highest details. When I had 2 GB of RAM and one of my sticks died, I had to temporarily play on only one stick. And it took FOREVER for things to load, and things were VERY stuttery for at least the first five minutes of a match. Trust me on this... 2 GB is the minimum you want if you plan to go any higher than texture detail level 3.
Here's the thing though... even the cheapest Core 2 will run UT3 like a dream. Like this
Core 2 Duo E8500 for a mere $179.99.
The Pentium Dual-Core E5200, however, is
$69.99. Long story short, you can have a far superior processor if you throw in another Benjamin and Hamilton. It's really not that much. And you won't need to overclock to get to work with UT3. It's really not all that much for a CPU... and it's not a bad one at all. Well worth the money, if you ask me.
Regardless of the purchase, make sure your motherboard can support it. But remember... cheap parts, cheap performance. If you don't want a huge, fancy videocard, fine. In fact, you probably don't need more than a 8800 to run the game good. (But if you can, by all means get something slightly improved, like the 9800s.) But that's an awesome CPU for under 200 bucks there... it'd be like night and day compared to your Celeron D. Whereas, in my opinion, the E5200 would be more like night and dawn.
Simply put... Faster bus + more cache = better performance + more fps. It's your money in the end, but if that thing can barely handle UT3, it'll have heart attacks versus something like, say, Fallout 3.