Nobody's shoving it down your throat.
I got no idea what "stat" is supposed to mean, but this is hilarious.DeeperShade said:I NEED 2 PLANKS OF SOLID OAK AND SOME NAILS! STAT!!!!
![]()
Or this other oneDear Ed.,
As the ranking results are unfolding, I am met with considerable surprise. The defense industry giants [Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics], which create weapons of death and destruction and are constantly devising new ways to maim and murder, are receiving among the lowest votes. Perhaps this is because the defense companies "advertise" their wares in ways which are not directed towards "average consumers." Or perhaps no one has noticed the terror that these weapons inflict. The values these companies operate under are in direct violation of anything resembling humanity's progress.
These are surprising results, but useful because they expose a hole in our consciousness. We need to shed light into many such holes, but especially this one because the defense corporations represent a bottomless pit from which thousands of innocent dead never return.
OK, so the dirty dozen were voted by your fans. I have a very hard time with this list. I think you, or your voters, have some kinda tunnel vision. I could beat, your dozen, without even consulting my sources. Where to begin? Dow, McDonnell Douglas, Royal Dutch Shell, Bechtel, Halliburton, Cargill.
McDonalds is bad for what? Bad Burgers? Labor Practices? How does that stack up against napalm and Bhopal? We shouldn't be looking past the corpations that kill so many people.
MetalMickey said:McDonalds have operated an aggressive marketing strategy that succesfully aimed to culturally institutionalise their product. They have billion dollar divisions of marketing people who work with psychologists and other specialists in order to draw up campaigns which will specifically appeal to children, starting from when their audio-visual perceptions come onstream. Your average US child can identify the golden arches logo long before they can read or write. They couple their agressive targeting of children with a campaign at parents, suggesting that their children will love them more if they take them to McDonalds. So what you have is children brainwashed into nagging parents to take them to McDonalds, and when the parent refuses the child refers to the advert which suggests that parents who love their kids take them to mcdonalds. This **** is nothing short of emotional blackmail, and it works. Go to your local McDonalds and check it out.
None of this is even touching on the issues of Fast Food outlets operating in schools, selling to a captive market of kids. FFS, the school system in the US is so reliant on private income they recieve commission on each meal and soft drink sold to kids! I saw an advertising hoarding from taco bell outside one highschool in the US. I dont imagine it is unique.
Fast food and other corporations have even gained influence over curriculum materials in US schools by funding the cash-strapped system. As well as that, they have successfully bought off enough US politicians to ensure that worker protections are practically nil in their industry, that they can recruit form illegal immigrant markets, the disabled, the chronically unemployable, and various others from the weakest and most vunerable fringes of society, employ them at minimum wage to work long unsociable hours with no insurance or other benfits.
Dont even get me started on their anti-competitive practices in the agricultural sector, where they have driven 95% of the production of potatoes in the US into the hands of just 4 corporations, destroying a sector that was free-market, employing tens of thousands of honest americans trying to make a buck.
Or how they operate their slaughterhouses, with dreadful unhygenic environments, mass prodution of e-coli, dispicable treatment of their largely illegal workforces and rallies against institution of worker rights, health insurance, pensions and everything else.
Subsidies are probably more to blame for that than a single buyer.
Their own fault for humping a quarter pounder...tobler1 said:people have caught sexually transmitted infections from mcdonalds...
I do believe this is pretty sick and evil...
When I was young, McDonalds was always treated like a reward. You don't indulge kids with everything they want, or they become spoiled little ****s. To be honest, that is an ingenious marketing scheme. They have been doing it for a long time, and it has been very successful. The point of advertising is to convince people to buy your product. It is up to the person to decide if it's in their (or their child's) best interest or not. This is completely different from, say, using a cartoon camel to sell cigarettes.MetalMickey said:McDonalds have operated an aggressive marketing strategy that succesfully aimed to culturally institutionalise their product. They have billion dollar divisions of marketing people who work with psychologists and other specialists in order to draw up campaigns which will specifically appeal to children, starting from when their audio-visual perceptions come onstream. Your average US child can identify the golden arches logo long before they can read or write. They couple their agressive targeting of children with a campaign at parents, suggesting that their children will love them more if they take them to McDonalds. So what you have is children brainwashed into nagging parents to take them to McDonalds, and when the parent refuses the child refers to the advert which suggests that parents who love their kids take them to mcdonalds. This **** is nothing short of emotional blackmail, and it works. Go to your local McDonalds and check it out.
The only time I had that was in high school, and it was Pizza. It was really good when they started doing it, because with the food they served in the cafeteria it wasn't uncommon for people to go all day without eating. Having your first meal of the day at 4:00pm after school isn't what I call healthy. Except for the largest of schools, I've not heard of that much. Most college campuses do have some sort of fast food available on campus though. We have Long Johns and KFC in our cafeteria, as well as a deli shop, and a pizza place.one of this is even touching on the issues of Fast Food outlets operating in schools, selling to a captive market of kids. FFS, the school system in the US is so reliant on private income they recieve commission on each meal and soft drink sold to kids! I saw an advertising hoarding from taco bell outside one highschool in the US. I dont imagine it is unique.
Those vulnerable fringes of society have to work somewhere. Fast food jobs are perfect for unskilled workers and kids getting their first job. You can't expect them to pay people $10 per hour to ask someone if they want fries with that.fast food and other corporations have even gained influence over curriculum materials in US schools by funding the cash-strapped system. As well as that, they have successfully bought off enough US politicians to ensure that worker protections are practically nil in their industry, that they can recruit form illegal immigrant markets, the disabled, the chronically unemployable, and various others from the weakest and most vunerable fringes of society, employ them at minimum wage to work long unsociable hours with no insurance or other benfits.
That's how the free-market works. The one who can make the most of a product, the most efficiently will be the one who is successful. The government needs to quit wasting money on protecting small, inferior businesses and models. It only hurts us in our competition with other countries. When someone outdoes your business, you change or go work for someone else.Dont even get me started on their anti-competitive practices in the agricultural sector, where they have driven 95% of the production of potatoes in the US into the hands of just 4 corporations, destroying a sector that was free-market, employing tens of thousands of honest americans trying to make a buck.
There needs to be a big crackdown on illegal immigrants period. That would take care of a lot of this problem, as there probably wouldn't be enough Americans who would agree to work in those conditions. As for the e-coli, I've never gotten sick from eating at a fast food resteraunt, although I did from a mid-range resteraunt once. I'm assuming you're talking about the areas of waste, and that being a danger to the workers? There's definately improvements that need to be made in that area.Or how they operate their slaughterhouses, with dreadful unhygenic environments, mass prodution of e-coli, dispicable treatment of their largely illegal workforces and rallies against institution of worker rights, health insurance, pensions and everything else.
tobler1 said:well I'm asuming somebody who worked there got some of their bodily fluids in the "secret sauce"...
Daedalus said:I think 2 said it best "Discussing politics..it's...completely ****ing useless. It like Ted Koppel's toupee, no one gets anywhere with it and no one is going to change their opinion and it's completely ****ing pointless."
This isn't politics. This is like OMG TEH BIG CORPOREALATIONS ARE EVIL AND THEY DESTROY THE RAINFOREST
Carefully. Very carefully.hal said:So, uh... how is Rupert Murdoch going to take over the world?
None of this is even touching on the issues of Fast Food outlets operating in schools, selling to a captive market of kids. FFS, the school system in the US is so reliant on private income they recieve commission on each meal and soft drink sold to kids! I saw an advertising hoarding from taco bell outside one highschool in the US. I dont imagine it is unique.
MetalMickey said:
Of course - anyone who disagrees with your opinion is an ignorant moron incapable of rational thought, right?
You think there is no such thing as a corporation that fits the dictionary description of evil (Morally bad or wrong; wicked)?
Perhaps your time would be better spent studying a little recent Latin-American history, rather than using Straw Man tactics in this debate.