_Lynx said:The game is being developed on nVidia hardware, so may be nVidia will have some advantage. But UT2003/2004 have equal performance on rival cards.
I found that so funny when I first heard of the problem.BeerGut said:Oh please. Nvidia just gives Epic endorsement money for having their logo in the game. Tomb Raider Legend has the same logo and it ran like crap on Nvidia cards until they came out with a new driver. They had the audacity to say, "plays best on Nvidia" in the game and it was getting 2-8fps due to the drivers.
Reminds me of Unreal 2/UT2003. It says "Maximise your experience with Pentium 4" on the back of the boxes, yet AMD completely owns Intel on any Unreal 2 engine based gameBeerGut said:Oh please. Nvidia just gives Epic endorsement money for having their logo in the game. Tomb Raider Legend has the same logo and it ran like crap on Nvidia cards until they came out with a new driver. They had the audacity to say, "plays best on Nvidia" in the game and it was getting 2-8fps due to the drivers.
You say that as if Intel wins on some other gamesElectrolyte said:Reminds me of Unreal 2/UT2003. It says "Maximise your experience with Pentium 4" on the back of the boxes, yet AMD completely owns Intel on any Unreal 2 engine based game
Mætlöaff said:I would just wait until the x1900 drops price, if you're aiming for a single card.
Outperforms? Not really. It posts higher framerates, but ATI's drivers have a nasty habit of turning off features you turn on when it wants higher framerates.Neophoenix said:Computer Gaming World just did an artical last month saying that the ATI Radeon X1900 XT has the best performance for what you pay. And it's not overly priced like the GeForce 7800 GTX 512. Plus it is only 50$ more that the Radeon X1800 XT. And considering That the 1800 even out performs the 7800, I would go for the ATI if you are going to buy in the near future.