no, my point was that looking at the history of the middle east with depth will explain why it is as it is. You need to understand how a problem like this has emerged to combat it effectively. Remember that we live in a society where the average attention span of someone doesn't go back more than a couple years.
I totally agree with you that history explains how we got to this point. That's the very idea of history

The original argument that lead to the exchange we're having right now was what level of involvement Islam did have for the current situation to become reality, I agree that short attention spans or non existing ones are a problem.
The whole modern salafist movement is as close to martin luther islam has gotten.
Could you explain that statement? Especially in relation to what salafis stand for.
In general there has been an increased neoconservatism in the middle east in the last 100 years. Although i am not quite sure that this is even the correct term because a lot of these salafists come with stuff that nobody in the 7th century believed in.(from the earth being flat to various extremely simplistic interpretations of passages because all the other interpretations are 2 hard)
Yeah, agree, it's something similar we've seen in the US at the fringes of society(Teaparty, In god we trust preppers, pro-lifers etc.), doesn't change that we're currently talking about extreme interpretations of the Koran used to justify the killing of innocent people. Innocent people of which a grotesquely huge number were muslims themselves, easily outnumbering the bodycount these extremists caused on what is called 'the west'.
edit: somewhere in that post I wanted to put something in about how my mind is still boggled how people would let themselves be snared by such cults for such heinous acts but then we have leo in here who'd believe anything you say as long as you give him the feeling of being on his side(the very thing that drives sectarianism?).