Sweet Sweet Candy...

[Vega-don]

chuckus is right

bring me a sword !

 

[UN17]

How about a non-eutactic mono-molecular nanotech sword, made in Hong Kong?

 

[Psychomorph]

Yes, and the soldier has a black coat and sunglasses and is able to activate his neuro implantats.

 

[ThunderChunky]

The 1911 would have been a SIG220, but Jeremy preferred the 1911, so I animated it. And that's why it's in the bonus pack.

 

[Psychomorph]

Ahh, damn, the SIG220 would be better. But 1911 is still a good option.

 

[keihaswarrior]

Do the new weapons have correct collision lengths? I ask this because many (most) of the INF weapons currently have incorrect lengths as well as the new weapons coded by Duke (xm8 and m16a4).

I posted my screenshots of the collision errors with some of the weapons in this thread: http://forums.beyondunreal.com/showthread.php?t=136534

 

[yurch]

How about a non-eutactic mono-molecular nanotech sword, made in Hong Kong?

You mean one, even though retractable, that still manages to take up the storage space of an ordinary sword?

 

[Fat Marrow]

You mean one, even though retractable, that still manages to take up the storage space of an ordinary sword?

I think, yurch, that you're confusing weapon weight with weapon bulk.

 

[keihaswarrior]

Here are some more screenshots showing the incorrect collision lengths with current INF weapons:

 

[MP_Duke]

Would you screw off with that collision crap. In the end it does not matter that much because you can always push passed the endpoint like so.

If it feels ok in first person, there's no need to badger us about it.
The only weapon that is reallly whack is the shotgun.

 

[erehwoN]

Would you screw off with that collision crap. In the end it does not matter that much because you can always push passed the endpoint like so.

 

[Shrap]

By the way keihas ...how's the carrying handle coming off ? Can't wait to see pictures

 

[Nukeproof]

Would you screw off with that collision crap. In the end it does not matter that much because you can always push passed the endpoint like so.

If it feels ok in first person, there's no need to badger us about it.
The only weapon that is reallly whack is the shotgun.

I agree that 1st person handling should be the major concern.

the original reason why keihas and I started checking the collision length of weapons (here http://forums.beyondunreal.com/showthread.php?t=136534), was the question wether supressors do add to it or not.

Since more cumbersome weaponhandling is pretty much the only major drawback of supressors in current INF, I think its worth to pay attention to it. (unless you want everybody to use available supressors by default)

 

[Dr_Strangelove]

Since more cumbersome weaponhandling is pretty much the only major drawback of supressors in current INF, I think its worth to pay attention to it. (unless you want everybody to use available supressors by default)

In all seriousness, my use of suppressors has more to do with the mood I am in than the situation at hand. Sometimes I like to feel stealthy, sometimes I want to make a loud bang.

 

[Nukeproof]

I don't say everybody running around with a supressur would spoil anything, at least not for me

 

[cracwhore]

It effects gameplay, and personally, I'd like the adjustments to be made, especially for the shotgun.

But then again, what do I know? I'm just a part of the active fanbase!

*pffttt...damned players have no idea what they're talking about...n00bs..*

 

[MP_Duke]

^ That is correct, you know nothing...
Anyhow, the adjustments have been made in this bonus pack.

 

[FieldMedic]

I really don't want to hurt anyone feelings , but i have a request (please do not kill me) :
Is it possible to see some more screenshots of this addon pack ?
Just something to drool on a bit more

 

[erehwoN]

More than this ?

 

[FieldMedic]

I was not prepared to face this screenshots invasion, it is unfair !

Thanks for the link erehwoN