Wrong, in United States v. Miller the Supreme Court ruled that the "militia" refered to in the Second Amendment is composed of all civilians.the supreme court ruled that the people do NOT have the right to possess a weapon in their homes for private use
In other words private citizens have more of a right to weapons than a soldier does.The Militia which the States were expected to maintain and train is set in contrast with Troops which they (p.179)were forbidden to keep without the consent of Congress. The sentiment of the time strongly disfavored standing armies; the common view was that adequate defense of country and laws could be secured through the Militia--civilians primarily, soldiers on occasion
You miss the point of Constitutional law entirely. The United States does not HAVE THE RIGHT TO PASS LAWS THAT REGULATE DRUGS. Therefore any federal laws that attempt to do so are null and void.No.. actually you do not, because its a federal law, meaning the states cannot override it.
Many states ban the sales of assault rifles. A civilian in California is not supposed to own an AR-15, although a police officer can use one to kill black people he doesn't like at will.weapons that a civilian can easily get, they get AR-15s
If education is controlled by states why do we have a Department of Education in the federal government? BA limits were mandated by Congress, any state not using the .08 limit gets money restricted to it. The Civil War wasn't about slavery. The South wanted to leave the Union because the federal government was too strong.Education is still controlled by the states... BA limits are still state decided, interstate commerce isnt controlled by the Federal Government either, it is taxed. Thats true.. the south didnt want the federal government from having control, because 88% of their money was made thru slavery... and if they said "no, you cant own slaves" they would lose out big time
That is more gun control advocate bull****. There has never in any year in the United States even been half that number of TOTAL gun deaths. Last year was a relativly high gun death year with 30,000 total deaths by firearm. You must be using some very wierd logic to say that of 30000 gun deaths, 78000 were accidental.Where are you getting this information? Because if people were killed accidentally that would be malpractice, so are you saying that 120,000 doctors/nurses were fired that year as well? 1500 accidental gun deaths? are you kidding me? the lowest number of accidental gun deaths since 1977 has been 78,000 in 1982
And no, accidental deaths are not malpractice unless there was a systemic lapse in judgement that could have easily been avoided.
I completely agree. But cops, in my experience are largely corrupt people, and nothing more than the state's whores, more concerned about their jobs than doing what is legal.uh......no..... the cause of the majority of crime in the united states is the fact that drugs are not legal
No, cops can and do do exactly this. They arn't supposed to but they do.no.. a police officer can not barge into a house unless hes under hot pursuit. If he has no warrent, he can not come in, plain and simple
Nearly every police department in the United States has automatic rifles. If I can't own one, why can they?actually.. no.. the average police officer is not armed with any of that, he has a radio and a sidearm. Criminals can easily buy an AK-47 at a gun show and alter it to be full-auto. You make it seem like every cop in the US has an assault rifle, and a tank.. no.. not at all
You put way to much trust in cops. Warrantless searches are not uncommon and if a cop does find something in a warrantless search he can ask a judge for an after the fact warrant and make it legal.A police officer will not search your house if he has no search warrent, if he does, he violated your rights and anything he found cannot be used as evidence against you
We do get involved in the South. And the results are not good: corrupt governments only gain power (in Columbia they burn rebel cocaine facilities but the government produces cocaine itself) and we murder tourists (the missionary shot down by forces under CIA command is a well known example).I resent that comment, my father was deeply envolved in stopping illegal drug trade from south america. I know for a fact that we seize over 65 million dollars in illegal drugs from central/south america every year. On top of that, do you expect us to send police officers to stop illegal traffic in a foreign country? Of course not, that is not our country, we send DEA agents there to advise their respective govts, but we do not have the right to arrest citizens not from our borders