citizens who pack heat are 3 times more likley to shoot their family members than any criminal.
Wrong. You probably got this information from the Kellerman Study, which has been discredited once a day, every day, for the past 10 years. The Kellerman study only takes into account instances in which the criminal is killed. In most cases the criminal leaves after merely witnessing the gun or a warnings hot is fired.
i think that just like a car... you should have to have a license that you have to renew
A car is a privelage, a gun is a right. Your human rights come from the fact that you are a sentient living thing, not from a piece of paper. Do you think we should need a license to speek freely?
i think you should have to pass vision tests
Only people who don't need vision correction should be able to use guns? Thats less than half the people of America. Is someone with good vision better than someone without? Because according to this statement you think someone who doesn't have good vision
should be subject to more crime (since someone who doesn't own a gun isn't as safe).
i think that if you are a convicted felon
I only quoted this because I thought it would make me seem more moderate if I said I agreed with something
It is legal for convicted felons to lose some rights, a common one being the right to vote (thank god for that, if criminals could vote we would definitly have gun control). But it should be for violent crimes. A person practicing his right to use marijuana shouldn't have his other rights taken away.
if the police didnt have a warrent, they would have dropped all charges because if any evidence is produced illegally its declared null and void and cannot be used to convict anyone
No, it would not have been delcared null and void. The police search without warrents all the time. they
should have dropped all charges, but wouldn't.
And NRA1, police arn't stopping crimes if they are commiting crimes themselves. In this case that is exactly what they did. Everytime a cop enforces an illegal law, he is commiting a crime. Every time a cop abuses someone's rights enforcing that illegal law, the victim has a right to kill the cop just as they would any other criminal. Cops do not have a license to rape and plunder as the please. Every citizen should enforce the law. The only difference between a cop and any other citizen is a cop is paid to do it. Therefore, a cop has no special privalges to do what he wants. He can't bust into my home without a warrent just like any normal person can't just bust into my home. And, NRA1, ironically, the government you are pimping for actually seems to agree with me. It is constitutionally legal in every state to kill a cop in self defense if they are using unjustified force or abusing your rights.