the obvious name calling was a jab at name calling itself.
bingo! you fucking idiots
but they're not just talking points. you can call them that, but that doesn't make it so. if you don't want to respond to them because you don't want to, that's fine.
but don't sit there and reply with stupid bullshit like "I could respond, and I could cite counterpoints, but I won't because blah blah blah."
that's retarded.
instead of filling in for Larkin, just don't get involved if you don't want to.
I'll be the first one to agree with you when you say that the problems we face today are the result of politicians on both sides of the aisle. that's pretty undeniable. but in aggregate, especially when it comes to domestic fiscal policy, the GOP carries far greater blame than the Democrats.
either debate that, or stop replying.
bingo! you fucking idiots
but they're not just talking points. you can call them that, but that doesn't make it so. if you don't want to respond to them because you don't want to, that's fine.
but don't sit there and reply with stupid bullshit like "I could respond, and I could cite counterpoints, but I won't because blah blah blah."
that's retarded.
instead of filling in for Larkin, just don't get involved if you don't want to.
I'll be the first one to agree with you when you say that the problems we face today are the result of politicians on both sides of the aisle. that's pretty undeniable. but in aggregate, especially when it comes to domestic fiscal policy, the GOP carries far greater blame than the Democrats.
either debate that, or stop replying.
quote me acting like a cunt and I'll concede.I also have to point out how you've acted like a complete cunt to everyone else in the thread from the very first post.
Last edited: