"You will not invade Iran"

[Zaccix]

I just want to say one thing very firmly and clearly to the newly re-inaugurated President Bush.

You will not invade Iran. Is that clear? You will not turn the square above into a 'green zone' for stooge politicians of your choosing and a restricted, embedded international press corps. You will not impose by force your conception of 'freedom'. You will not occupy Teheran and Ispahan, after a brief but terrible aerial bombing campaign, with your ****ing jeeps, your mercenary 'contractors', your torture squads. You will not kill hundreds of thousands of Iranians now alive. You have no right even to be thinking about such a thing, let alone threatening it. Who the **** do you think you are to go round the world invading countries one by one?

Read more...

I saw this post by chance and I totally agree with Imomus, the author. While the US government hasn't actually said they're going to invade Iran, they have no right to even think about doing such a thing.

Bush should concentrate on stabilising Iraq first; after all, liberation from terror (along with the WMD that were never there) was his reason to invade in the first place. The square shown in Imomus' post should be intact in four years time.

 

[Sam_The_Man]

Why do you hate America?

 

[[IsP]KaRnAgE]

Why do you hate...freedom?













Communist!

 

[SlayerDragon]

Communist!

Yeah, he's such a commie that I bet his blood is red!!!!!


















Oh shi!

 

[stoned_jedi]

im sure bush has read the post and has put his (sorry the oil companys) plans on hold

 

[Beowolf]

You will not kill hundreds of thousands of Iranians now alive.

That figure is ridiculous.

your torture squads

Gross exaggeration. Torture squads? Please.

You have no right even to be thinking about such a thing, let alone threatening it.

Tell that to the terrorists who blow up busses everyday or fly passenger jets into buildings.

Who the **** do you think you are to go round the world invading countries one by one?

The leader of the most powerful nation in the world? Not that that is a justification, I know. Why doesn't this guy start bitching on the terrorists and corrupted regimes? Probably because he would fear for his life if his did so. So, go ahead, act all big and strong jumping on the bandwagon and cracking on America/Bush.

Please note, though, I do not support Bush or the potential invasion of Iran.

 

[SlayerDragon]

Please note, though, I do not support Bush or the potential invasion of Iran.

 

[Sam_The_Man]

Because I'm bored of arguing against the 'let's kill everyone before they think about killing us' argument, I'm going to argue for it, using the debating techniques I've learnt in the creationism/evolution thread.

So let's start mixing it up!

You cannot prove conclusively that the war in Iraq is a good thing or a bad thing. Therefore the evidence must be equally in favour of each position, or 50/50. Now, 50/50 = 20/20, which means 'perfect', so therefore the case for the invasion of Iraq must be perfect.

Also, people with PhDs and other things I can't pronounce have said that the war in Iraq is good thing, and they must be right, as opposed to those with PhDs who said it was a bad thing who are all frauds.

 

[tool]

Read more...

I saw this post by chance and I totally agree with Imomus, the author. While the US government hasn't actually said they're going to invade Iran, they have no right to even think about doing such a thing.

Bush should concentrate on stabilising Iraq first; after all, liberation from terror (along with the WMD that were never there) was his reason to invade in the first place. The square shown in Imomus' post should be intact in four years time.

lol livejournal.com link lol

Sorry but livejournal... what were you thinking?

Besides we aren't invading Iran, Bush hasn't even hinted at it. And there is no reason to. They don't support terrorism, they aren't making wmd, and they have been working closely with the U.N. to prove what they are doing within their own country is legitimate. Iraq is already a failure now that we are no longer looking for WMD there, imagine how badly Iran would go?

 

[SlayerDragon]

Besides we aren't invading Iran, Bush hasn't even hinted at it.

Que?

 

[Sam_The_Man]

Sorry but livejournal... what were you thinking?

It's an opinion piece, not a source. What's your problem, exactly?

Besides we aren't invading Iran, Bush hasn't even hinted at it. And there is no reason to. They don't support terrorism, they aren't making wmd, and they have been working closely with the U.N. to prove what they are doing within their own country is legitimate. Iraq is already a failure now that we are no longer looking for WMD there, imagine how badly Iran would go?

In other words, you agree with the Livejournaler?

LOL YOU LOSE AT INTERNET

 

[tool]

It's an opinion piece, not a source. What's your problem, exactly?



In other words, you agree with the Livejournaler?

LOL YOU LOSE AT INTERNET

Actually it isn't an opinion, the guy is stating for a "fact" that Bush is going to invade Iran, even though there has never been any sources saying that will happen.

No you lose at the internets. I'm not agreeing with the lovejournaler at all. He is assuming Bush is planning on invading Iran, infact he seems to think he knows for a fact that Bush is going to do it. I don't agree with that at all because I have never seen a single thing saying that Bush would invade Iran.

 

[Sam_The_Man]

Actually it isn't an opinion, the guy is stating for a "fact" that Bush is going to invade Iran, even though there has never been any sources saying that will happen.

Did you even read it? He is telling Bush not to invade Iran. Hell, he even says "You will not invade Iran". That sounds like exactly the opposite of what you're saying he's saying.

(It's partly because the guy doesn't know the difference between 'shall' and 'will', but then he is, as you said, a Livejournalite.)

 

[O.S.T]

where are the jaw-pics?

 

[Zaccix]

I was going to quote and reply, quote and reply etc. Instead, I'll just say that it's an opinion piece that I happen to agree with, I'm not a communist even if I have some Russian heritage, and this wasn't meant to be an anti-America thread.

Personally, I have no problem with the US, just the people in charge of running it (much like I do with the people in charge of the UK as well). In fact, I'll be able to experience Bush's America first hand when I go there this summer - that is, if "Bush's America" extends to Oregon. As long as George, Condoleeza and co. stay out of my face for those two weeks, I'll be happy.

[edit]
Just one more thing. The way I read the post, it's not a statement of fact, but more of a warning (albeit one that probably will never reach its intended target).
[/edit]

 

[tool]

(It's partly because the guy doesn't know the difference between 'shall' and 'will', but then he is, as you said, a Livejournalite.)

Exactly, you just don't take anything even if it is a opinion you agree with seriously if it comes from Livejournal. Livejournal is place on the internet where you share your experiences cutting up your arms, or how you threw up dinner.

I read it as a fact like the guy was getting on his high horse and acting like he believed for a fact Bush was invading Iran but that the invasion would fail. I agree that IF Bush were to invade Iran it would be a failure. But I don't believe it is ever going to happen.

As much as I hate George Bush, I also hate all this "AMERICA WILL BE DESTROYING THE ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST IN THE NEXT FOUR YEARS! ITS A FACT GUYS! LOL!" arguement. I tend to be pretty neutral towards this whole George Bush vs. the middle east faggotry.

Nither side (for and against the war with Iraq) has shown much intelligance. About as much as a rock.

 

[O.S.T]

I'm not against a war with the iran
look: bush is in a mission of god
like the iran

we have 2 countries, which have the support of god if they go to war, even if they fight against each other

I think it's just a big plan of god to get rid off both sides

 

[Zxanphorian]

Bush should concentrate on stabilising Iraq first

Bush should have concentrated on stabilising Afghanistan before going into Iraq.

How i view this matter:

Afghanistan = justified for invading.
Iraq = not justified for invading.

 

[Vers Vlees]

Why do you hate...freedom?













Communist!

Commies are out it should be Terrorist

 

[tool]

Bush should have concentrated on stabilising Afghanistan before going into Iraq.

How i view this matter:

Afghanistan = justified for invading.
Iraq = not justified for invading.

My thoughts exactly. Afghanistan pretty much declared war on the U.S., while Iraq just had a pissy fit (not wanting inspectors into the country was a no no, but nothing to get suspecious over) but they didn't do anything wrong.