Kitty.cat said:
My manipulation is subtle.
Your manipulation is nonexistant. Manipulation implies there's a goal to any of this. I think the word you were looking for is "masturbation", champ.
I can't tell you how many on message boards think they're original with that "manipulation" line. Usually they later bitch about not being able to directly "confront" the "people" they "disagree" with "in person"... but I guess you shot yourself in the foot there with that whole hidden sexual identity thing, didn't you?
No way to keep those nerds in line at all, eh? You can't shame them, and not even the potential PICSZ!!!!1 can keep them contained (at least, if you don't reveal your gender first). And rational argument or acceptable mannerisms are certainly too much to expect!
That internet sucks sometimes, doesn't it? It just isn't
fair.
If you want to argue policy... then I'd say if you're not part of the INF game community, why the hell are you in the INF forums?
I'd say that's our business and none of yours, and I sure don't remember having to abide by an inconsequential genderless someone making useless definitions before. (Hint: who could I be talking about!??!)
I have no idea who the hell you are, but you made deathren into a voice of reason, and that's got to be a criminal offense somewhere. If you are seen as shallow, that's your presentation's problem, and not the fault of our perception. You will remain as such until you wise up or piss off.
And hey - if you end up leaving... take pipe with you. Please.
Edit: geo, there's no point to explaining history. It's not like she he it respects that sort of thing.