what the hell is he thinking??!!
- Thread starter Rukee
- Start date
-
Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.
Cat Fuzz said:Right, because pointing out the hypocrisy of the left has nothing to do with anything.
Case in point: Making colossal generalisations isn't useful.
Well, I suppose you do have a point. Bush and his administration is smart enough to refuse to testify under oath.Cat Fuzz said:
Politicians are inherently savvy PR people (the good ones) when it comes to misleading people, so pointing the finger at 'the left' and 'liberals' achieves what exactly?
Last night on Fox one of thier guest commentators accused the 'other news' as talking with a 'hammer and sickle'
wtf?
Great political arena
Last night on Fox one of thier guest commentators accused the 'other news' as talking with a 'hammer and sickle'
wtf?
Great political arena
Cat Fuzz said:
lolz.
Cat Fuzz said:
Yeah yeah Clinton is such bastard. We know. He lied about getting a blowjob. It was a felony. He is a criminal. What a deplorable human being he is.
Cat Fuzz said:
FLIPFLOP!!!1
I can blame liberals, but the point is the ones running can't just poke fun of bush and exspect to win and any credability from me,or votes.
It is so foolish,impeech bush for spying,what is the stpidest thing there is, do people in the usa actually think they don't have power to spy on us long before 911.
we were never private,specialy now with trackable cell phone, ssn, list goes on.but judge or no judge it's the same thing.
oh well i dont care what happens, wait for hillary so i can get my me me free stuff.Bill Gates wil have prolly 5 bucks, and bumms will be all set.
It is so foolish,impeech bush for spying,what is the stpidest thing there is, do people in the usa actually think they don't have power to spy on us long before 911.
we were never private,specialy now with trackable cell phone, ssn, list goes on.but judge or no judge it's the same thing.
oh well i dont care what happens, wait for hillary so i can get my me me free stuff.Bill Gates wil have prolly 5 bucks, and bumms will be all set.
Wiretapping isn't the issue. Whether or not it should be subject to judicial review is. It was until Bush did it without even a usually secret authorisation. That's downright, and undeniably, corrupt.
Cat Fuzz
Qualthwar's Minion. Ph34r!
Mister_Prophet said:
That's not what I was refering to. If Bush lied about Iraq being a threat and having WMD then Clinton also lied about it and is more responsible. That is, IF it was a lie, which I don't believe it was. Why would Bush lie just to play with his tanks and guns? Why would he go so far as to LIE knowing that we wouldn't find anything? If he was capable of lying about it and getting everyone to play along why couldn't he have manufactured some evidence? It would have been easy to do. Instead, we delayed, trying to get the UN to grow a backbone and actually have some meaning while Saddam had 14 months to move all his toys out of the country to Syria or who-knows-where.
So, if Bush lied about Iraq, it had to have been Clinton that started it since most of the intel was based on stuff gathered during Clintons terms in office.
Cat Fuzz
Qualthwar's Minion. Ph34r!
Cat Fuzz said:
There's a difference between saying my favorite shoe is in that kid's house and saying my favorite shoe is in that kid's house while I'm breaking down his door with a bulldozer and a swat team covering my rear as we infiltrate his home.
I don't see the point of saying Clinton lied. Yeah he lied, he's a politician. What's you point? WHAT possible relevance does this have to the present actions of this president? Are you saying that since another human being lied, the lies of another are not worth discussing?
A lot of shiit went down on Bush's watch. That's on him. Not Clinton. Stop crying about Clinton as a defense to whenever someone starts saying stuff about Bush. Especially when you're the kinda person who goes off on anyone who suggests that oil (gasp) might have been a factor in Iraq.
Oil? hahaha
ya sure"they have OI. ah hmm WMD, " well he musta lied then, cause I aint seeing this great oil boom.
Actually it was the aintiwar space cadets who made that a hidden bush goal, of wich there propaganda was a lie?
Hell they can't even blame right.
Only 2316 died in 3 years, ya woot,ya a really big "war".
ya sure"they have OI. ah hmm WMD, " well he musta lied then, cause I aint seeing this great oil boom.
Actually it was the aintiwar space cadets who made that a hidden bush goal, of wich there propaganda was a lie?
Hell they can't even blame right.
Only 2316 died in 3 years, ya woot,ya a really big "war".
Cat Fuzz
Qualthwar's Minion. Ph34r!
Cat Fuzz said:
I understand that you don't have one. I just find it strange how you tend to always get into a Clinton discussion for some reason whenever one of these "is Bush being stupid?" threads pop up
There haven't been any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. And I'm not one of those people who get all my sources from the evil satanic media.
Red said:
Seeing as how what you tend to see is selective man, I wouldn't be surprised either way
, but when people like me suggest that Oil was a possible factor in why we "really" went over there, we mean that it was a motivation. We've all seen the Michael Moore movie, and whether you like him or not (I preferred him better when he was targetting guns in Bowling for Columbine), video doesn't really lie. We know they were over there with troops guarding oil refineries before, why is it so farfetched to believe that Bush...with his whole cronyism thing going on...wouldn't think of oil as a possible benefit for sending troops into Iraq? These are motivating factors I'm referring to Red Fist, stuff like WMDs is what politicians refer to as "smokescreen". Red said:
Can you elaborate, I didn't catch this. Sorry.
Red said:
I don't care if one soldier died over there. It isn't about the size of this war, it's about the necessity. But I'd rather not hijack this thread into another "Iraq, yes or no" thing because it will just go on with a lot of bitching on both sides and it won't change the fact that we are there now and the whole hippie "let's pull out now" mentality is a waste of time since that's not an option anymore.