quoted from the NFA FAQ
FIREARM SILENCERS
While the statute calls these devices "silencers" or "mufflers",
the US NFA industry term is "sound suppressor", as the word
silencer has been given a negative connotation, and because it is
inaccurate, as these devices do not eliminate all sound from firing
a gun. However you can point the folks who get all high and mighty
about the use of the word "silencer" to this definition; it is the
legal term.
18 U.S.C. sec. 921(a)(24) "The term 'firearm silencer' or
'firearm muffler' means any device for silencing, muffling, or
diminishing the report of a portable firearm, including any
combination of parts, designed or redesigned, and intended for
use in assembling or fabricating a firearm silencer or firearm
muffler, and any part intended only for use in such assembly or
fabrication."
As can be seen this covers improvised sound suppressors, and
component parts of a sound suppressor. There is no thresh hold
level of sound reduction for something to fall under this
definition. ATF used to require the device "appreciably" lower the
sound (see Revenue Ruling 57-38) In general recoil compensators and
flash hiders do not fall under this definition, but some designs
could fall into the category. As with any borderline device the
thing to do is to get a written opinion from the Technology Branch
of ATF.
Originally posted by Dupre
The M900 Depleted Uranium APFSDS-T is a sabot round for the 105mm rifled cannon still in use by the US Marine Corp. The concept of high kinetic energy rounds is based on the round itself and not the cannon bore that fires it. It was designed after WW2 but smoothbores didn't arrive on the tank scene until the Russians mounted them on their tanks much later.
Originally posted by Gholam
Yes Dupre, I know that APFSDS rounds exist for rifled guns, it's just that smoothbore guns are much more suited for firing them - they are capable of achieving much higher velocities with much less barrel wear, and that's precisely what's needed for KE rounds, as they require muzzle velocity to be as high as possible.
Originally posted by Technophile
So Gryphon my question is, was it the fault of the gun or the Ammo?
Originally posted by The_Fur
isn't that why the chamber has an armored plate over it (at least the FAMAS has). Regardless what are the odds of a military rifle going kB! It's not like they use reloads that often.
I dunno... consider this, military rifles are built by the lowest bidder and maintained by children ... fresh out of public schools and learned most of what they know about guns from HollywoodRegardless what are the odds of a military rifle going kB!
Originally posted by Dupre
KE rounds are better off with rifled bores because rifled is more accurate than any smoothbore.
isn't that why the chamber has an armored plate over it (at least the FAMAS has). Regardless what are the odds of a military rifle going kB! It's not like they use reloads that often.
My experience was due to the ammunition. This happened over 5 years ago when this phenomena wasn't widely known. We had initially attributed it to a double charge, although since these were my dad's reloads done on a Dillon XL650 with a powder alarm, that was quickly written off. Years later, the ugly truth is revealed...Q: Can I shoot bare lead bullets from my Glock? If not, why?
A: It is not a good idea to shoot bare lead bullets from your Glock. There are two basic reasons, the first is that the polygonal rifling in a Glock barrel really grips the bullet - this causes lead bullets to leave heavy deposits of lead when the gun is fired - heavy deposits of lead can lead to over-pressure problems - over-pressure problems can lead to nasty things like case failures. The second reason is that where the chamber meets the bore there is a sharp full edge (standard rifling does not have such a pronounced edge). This edge can shave off lead from the bullet and cause a headspace problem (the round will not fully seat) - again, this can lead to things like a case failure. Shoot plated or jacketed bullets only.