I find it amazing that people can aggressivly insult others on the web, then maintain that they're not being either aggressive or insulting, and in the same post attempt to insult someone a bit more.
IndySkyz said:
Start Sh*t? I asked the guy what it was all about?, is he a Huge Bowie Fan?, did he just think it was cool that Bowie is pointing at the text? I was curious to see his reason for a sig like that, thought it was a strange sig for a guy on a gaming/mapping forum is all.
Yes, start sh*t. Either side of the Atlantic, "Whats with the David Bowie Sig dude? Some people are just plain strange." is an aggressive and contemptuous wording.
IndySkyz said:
Now if I really wanted wanted to be cool, I would take the time to make a cheesy custom pic and paste "How do you like my huge gay sig Indy" and then reply "The best thing is I am not even trying to be cool"
![Laugh :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/laugh.gif)
Oh and then biatch about being accused of being a homo, when my tag is "Exclusively Gay"
I especially like the way you just mixed up two seperate people and a couple of pronouns, not to mention the misquotation. I can see that a numerical list is obviously required.
--
1. I didn't make that picture. It was a response of a renowned mapper here to the "technicolour vomit" (his words) that sits under people's posts.
2. "Gay" is not a derogatory term, except to people who are ignorant or prejudiced. Massive amounts of medical, zoological and psychological evidence indicate that homosexuality is natural and not unhealthy. It happens in many other species, places and times, and never has it brought a civilisation down from within. The Greek army were total badasses, and lots of them were gay. Upshot: You can't insult me or anyone else with an iota of knowledge by using the term gay. Get over it.
3. Certain parts of third force psychology, the bulk of which was carried out during the third quarter of the twentieth century, indicate that to be "normal" is to be somewhat pathologically maladjusted. Study of people who are adept and ethical indicate that they are in fact not "normal". In this context, the term "freak" takes on an entirely non-insulting connotation. Once again, you're using a term that won't work.
4. You are, however, trying to insult various people with these labels. People are not in fact offended by the
content of your insults, but the fact that you are here and trying to insult them at all. That is, ahem, not cool.
5. So in summary, either by being aggressive or at best choosing your words very badly, you've just elicited a lot of dislike from pretty much everyone here. Also, the values you've betrayed to us, while unfortunately fairly common, are nonetheless about 30 years behind on relevant thinking. Like all forms of intolerance, they are doomed to be eventual cultural backwaters. For as long as you think it is right and proper for people to conform, and also to not be homosexual, the reality of humanness itself will "f" with you. You will lose.
6. Judging by your current title, from your P.O.V. I am undoubtedly a "biatch" who is "f'ing" with you. You should calm down by looking at this lovely photoshop lens flare: