*New member here*
I actually happened across this thread in a google search for information about the F88 and the Steyr AUG. Sorry to bring it back from the dead, but I was wondering, has anyone heard of the new US carbine design, the XM-8? (X because it hasn't been field-tested yet) For those who have heard of it, what do you think? Does it have a chance? Will it be as effective in the field as is it in the factory?
It's a very lightweight, modular carbine/rifle with extremely good durability and reliability. It doesn't have the jamming problems of the M16 and the M4. It actually comes with a cleaning kit (
) and, although not field tested yet, supposedly requires cleaning every 15 000 rounds. Cleaning every 10,000 rounds would ensure constant reliability. The
barrel life of the M-4 is, I believe, only 8 000 rounds. In addition, the cleaning process takes approximately four minutes, while cleaning the M-4 takes ten or twelve.
This, combined with its incredible flexibility and customizability (modular design) make it superior to the M-4 and M-16 in every way.
Some complaints about it arise from the fact that it uses the NATO standard 5.56 x 45 mm rounds. It has become apparent in recent conflicts that soldiers are very unhappy with the performance of these rounds, which are used in both the M-4 and M-16, as they do not always incapacitate a target. The much smaller wound allows enemies with wounds in less important places to continue fighting. There are many in support of a larger round such as a 6.8 or 7.62mm. However, due to the very lightweight design of the M-8, the recoil from a larger round would be horrendous. There is speculation that the size is not the problem, but rather the type. This gun also takes, I believe, AK-47 ammo. I could be wrong on that, though.
The M-8 will soon be field tested with two brigades in Iraq, as well as a number of individuals.