Their interest in the bottom line is whats fueling the development of the engine you stoogeswag said:but their interest in the bottom line is clouding the appropriate developement of the engine.
Their interest in the bottom line is whats fueling the development of the engine you stoogeswag said:but their interest in the bottom line is clouding the appropriate developement of the engine.
I dont know c++ but I can decipher what is happening in the code thanks, in part, to the year or so of college I took before reality hit me.TWD said:The reasons epic gives are completely legit. In order to patch ut2003 for it to be compatable with 2004 it would just be too much work. Time that could be spent doing usefull things.
As for proper documentation. More of the same. Epic doesn't have the time to waste writing up documentation so that complete n00bs out there can learn it. It is much better to leave it to the community. Most of unrealscript assumes that you already know c++ to begin with in which case you wouldn't need documentation you could just look at the code and learn that way.
Speaking of which, I hope to god that Dr.Sin is taking the hard line with '04. '03 didn't really live up to its supposedly "unhackable" reputation... i'd hate to see the same thing happen with '04.Dgizusse said:- Forget about using mutator/software like PunkBuster... It's 2 different games!!! That means no more cheat protection or way less efficient...
Yep. Mark said that and as usually LIED! ...Dont blame me...Swag said:And the point is that epic stated that backward compatibility would exist for all mods developed on ut2k3 in ut2k4.
By standars of optimization and looks.hal said:Swag... mediocre by what standards? Where are all of the better engines that are out right now and what games are on them?
EvilDrWong said:At the very least we'll have to recompile with the new source. At most we'll have to completely re-write stuff that we shouldnt have hacked up as much as we did anyway.
Doc_EDo said:Yep. Mark said that and as usually LIED! ...Dont blame me...
SkaarjMaster said:I'm not too bothered by this, but they need to quit f**king with the flak cannon.![]()
Doc_EDo said:Optimization: laggy as hell in outside maps. I have old games with HUGE outside maps that dont give me lag. UT2k3/U2 does.
Looks: Lighting on static meshes is the worst thing that ever happened to games. Dont even mention that baking of textures, ffs.
Also there is the issue of engine being undocumented which is huge problem for moders (you dont know what works how and you have to spend days to figure it out, instead of reading few lines in a documentation).
Its just looks like UT success was a clear random lucky success for Epic. They dont have anything more to offer.
WishMaster2003 said:This is simple version of my planUt2003+Upgrade patch=UT2004
I think this would be something,'cause day of defeat has come to retail version and Counter-strike too.Why dont they do upgrade patch to ut2003 ?I dont like to buy Ut2004,'cause I have Ut2003 already !!
What do you guys say ?