that would be the 66 mike-mike LAW. the short, disposable rocket that gal-z was talking about.
as the name implies a LAW is a lighter antitank rocket, as opposed to the full-on AT we have now. And gal-z is right about the other stuff too, assuming the rocket managed to detonate after striking such a soft target (the person) then there probably wouldnt be a very spectacular explosion and the hollow shaped charge probably wouldnt even liquefy properly.
that being said, if the rocket did detonate then the target and anyone hit by flying gobs of molten metal would probably be busted up pretty badly, if not killed.
but yah, we need minimum arming range, backblast, and an actual HEAT explosive rather then our current kludge.
IIRC no one is actually working on a mut for the AT4 right?
I would take a stab at it; but I have a significant, non-INF project going right now.
as the name implies a LAW is a lighter antitank rocket, as opposed to the full-on AT we have now. And gal-z is right about the other stuff too, assuming the rocket managed to detonate after striking such a soft target (the person) then there probably wouldnt be a very spectacular explosion and the hollow shaped charge probably wouldnt even liquefy properly.
that being said, if the rocket did detonate then the target and anyone hit by flying gobs of molten metal would probably be busted up pretty badly, if not killed.
but yah, we need minimum arming range, backblast, and an actual HEAT explosive rather then our current kludge.
IIRC no one is actually working on a mut for the AT4 right?
I would take a stab at it; but I have a significant, non-INF project going right now.