Obama is the presumptive democratic nominee
- Thread starter N1ghtmare
- Start date
-
Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.
Better question: who else thinks there's no chance Obama loses this election?
I'm hopeful that he'll win, but need I remind you that this country is full of people who not only voted for Bush once but twice. I've been saying it for months and I'll continue to say it: I won't be surprised if McCain gets elected.
All this bible quoting bull **** is making me barf. Just remember that your holy book was redone by a king to fit personal likings rather than the church.
Religion, no matter what branch or sect, has always killed and will always kill in the name of itself. It has always been that way, and it will always be that way. One person thinks they are more right then the next, and so hatred ensues, and so does killing. Sitting here saying your religion is the spitting image of perfect is not far from it being cows ass.
Religion, no matter what branch or sect, has always killed and will always kill in the name of itself. It has always been that way, and it will always be that way. One person thinks they are more right then the next, and so hatred ensues, and so does killing. Sitting here saying your religion is the spitting image of perfect is not far from it being cows ass.
And honestly Jonathan, stop watching Fox News, listening to Rush Limbaugh, and sucking on Ann Coulters clit.
It's really sickening.
It's really sickening.
If he decides to disagree with her political ideology, does he still get to suck on her clit?
Maybe if liberals could come up with an actual thought-out, well-considered remark, rather than obscene insults that make no sense, we would take them more seriously. But I have yet to see this happen.
First of all, the crusades were disastrous and brutal for all parties involved, but it was not a
Christian-induced slaughter as you've obviously been taught in school. It was an extreme retaliation to the Muslim raiding that took place before that.
Secondly, have you been living under a ****ing rock for twenty years? Muslim fundamentalists have been occupying themselves with such innocent activities as: beheading, bombing, and suicide ramming towers.
I suggest that you acquire a brain. Or at least use Google.
Last edited:
I didn't find any image, it was most likely too small.
In all seriousness, if it ain't cursive it never happened ;-)... but I'm sure you already knew
You totally missed the point. The holy crusades was vengeance in Gods name just as the terrorist claim they are doing it for Allah. It was a reply to Jonathans post, I'm just following his logic. And you are not totally correct about why the crusades took place. It was conquering, with religion as pretext spiced with holy retaliation.
Once again, this was a reply to Jonathan. With the same reasoning he uses when he claims that no Christians have killed or committed war we can free Islam from all charges.
Right back at ya.
Last edited:
It amazes me how upset anti-republicans get about fox news. democrats and liberals stand on the platform of free speech, tolerance and liberty, yet get so outraged that there's finally someone telling the other side of the story after having a totally left-biased media for decades...
Last edited:
I didn't know "other side of the story" is to scream out guests on a talk show and cut off their mike.
Which is why I refuse to take part in any religion. I don't know why people are so easily brainwashed with that crap.
No, you don't...only on this version of the forum you do. The older posts weren't carried over to this version.
So it's back to being wrong again for you.
