As soon as Mych finds the time to modify our "Lockdown Counter" and make it point to our JB2k4 Mothership on Sundays and to our JB3 Mothership on Wednesdays we can start the engines imo. Or is this something you (tarquin) are able to take care of aswell?tarquin said:
No one's playing JB2004
- Thread starter ZedMaestro
- Start date
-
Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.
ZedMaestro said:Something like whats attached?
nice, but news shots are 300 x 224 IIRC (check on PJB
)Sexmachine said:
I probably could, but I don't have an FTP client here
I think we have to put it off for a week.
Done and done! I have also removed JB-Arlon-Gold because of the capture lockups.CoolDude/Sig said:
ZedMaestro said:
oops... 200x225
PJB news shots down support thumbnails. That's POTW.
Perhaps put less text on it -- just 'JB2004 Mothership lands on Sundays' ?
'JB2004 Mothership cleared for landing on Sundays from xx November'
once we know the date.
And use a ship arena shot perhaps.
once we know the date.
And use a ship arena shot perhaps.
No one's playing JB2004? My clan is focussed on that (okok, iJB, but still JB )! We're still in the early days of the clan, but when we got some money (which will be very soon), we're gonna set up some kick-a$$ no-lag servers! Remember Unrealized Potential, we'll stick around for a loooong while
)! We're still in the early days of the clan, but when we got some money (which will be very soon), we're gonna set up some kick-a$$ no-lag servers! Remember Unrealized Potential, we'll stick around for a loooong while 
As Nova said, our clan (Unrealized-Potential) is focussed mainly on iJB (also iTDM) and we are looking for clan matchs now.
On the subect of maps, I am currently working on a DM map, but once that is finished I can finish JB-Tomb as a final version and maybe start work on more maps. I haven't really played on the mothership so I don't know about custom maps on it but the only server I have seen playing custom maps is the kokrull server that has been down for quite a while
Well, quite clearly, the screenshot I took isn't going to work at 200x225 (although I assume you mean 225x200, since pictures are landscape-orientated rather than portrait-orientated).
I'll set up another scene to take a screenshot from then or try to be really clever and take one in-game.
I'll set up another scene to take a screenshot from then or try to be really clever and take one in-game.
My hero 
I'm finding it incredibly difficult to make anything decent given the size constraints
Going off at a tangent because of this... can the PJB site be improved to support larger images? Sexmachine has posted pics 400 pixels wide.
And incidentally, the pic I've made is just about suitable when 400 pixels wide. To maintain scale, it becomes 320pixels high. Is that ok?
Addit:
Something like this is...
Going off at a tangent because of this... can the PJB site be improved to support larger images? Sexmachine has posted pics 400 pixels wide.
And incidentally, the pic I've made is just about suitable when 400 pixels wide. To maintain scale, it becomes 320pixels high. Is that ok?
Addit:
Something like this is...
Attachments
Last edited:
ZedMaestro said:
no... 300 x225. typo (AGAIN
)just check a pic on the news page to make sure...
tarquin said:no... 300 x225. typo (AGAIN
just check a pic on the news page to make sure...
You like making mistakes dont you...
Also UTClassic is ruling asses... shame that somepeople are calling the rocket launcher buggy and moaning: It fires too slow... its not firing rockets when i alt fire! To be honest i prefere the old to the new
Last edited:
Well, yet again that pic isnt suitable for 300x225. If you're finding it a little hard to read the IP immediately, you'll never get it in this one.
Why cant we increase the PJB pic size to a more suitable size for todays's computers?
Why cant we increase the PJB pic size to a more suitable size for todays's computers?
ZedMaestro said:
Well do you REALLY need the pic to have the ip adress? Cant you have the ip on the page or maybie a link direct to the action (the UT2004//6546.53.26.546 thingy)
People arnt really the type of people who take the time to write down an ip adress then type it in EVERY time they want to play...
ZedMaestro said:
I've got my windowed mode on Opera set up to do a 800*600 resolution window for web development. A quick switch to it shows that with the relatively large sidebars the main site is already pushing the boundaries of viewability with the current pic size. W3C estimates about 1/3 of internet users are still using 800*600 screen resolution, so it's probably not a good idea to increase the pic size.
I can't believe that., I don't personally know a single person who uses less than 1024 x 768Birelli said:
From the W3C's website:
To be fair as a gaming site PJB's readers probably have higher-tech computers than the global internet, and therefore higher screen resolutions. In general though you still need to support 800*600 screen resolutions when doing web development.
To be fair as a gaming site PJB's readers probably have higher-tech computers than the global internet, and therefore higher screen resolutions. In general though you still need to support 800*600 screen resolutions when doing web development.
Last edited: