how and why are we to take you as some expert?
If you consider me this or that is really up to you.
I get really sick of you contradicting even the slightest bit of reason, all because you want to play the part.
It's way past fun time for that stuff.
And wtf is that supposed to mean? We aren't running out of any of the sources of fuel that we use. period. They're all limited resources and that is clear, but the lie that you all of been feed that we are running out is simply not true.
If you were to say we should look for alternative energy for another reason I would be totally on-board with it, but I won't jump on-board if that reason is used.
And contradicting lies isn't a bad thing. People are taught lies these days as children. There is a need for people to break those lies to pieces. You can call the lies that you been raised to believe reason if you wish, but if you were wise you would look into everything that was ever taught to you.
I'm also not "playing" a part. I only act the way I am and say what I know and feel. I don't know what part you "play" on these forums and I really don't care.
das_ben said:
Once again, I'm mostly informed about the way things are run in Europe, and the problem here is, that the states handle the extremely costly final disposal mostly by themselves - thus indirectly financing nuclear power, which would be significantly more expensive otherwise.
It should be mentioned that most of the "cost" of the process comes from the policy and the regulations which is ofcourse where the facilities come in to being in the first place. It should also be mentioned that most of the waste storage in America is done at the power facility and is handled by the companies themselves. That was actually part my 1.3 cent kw cost.
Still what I meant by subsidy is that the power source isn't able to be feasible without subsidy. Nuclear power is similar though.
Not really the same as this, but its close.