I don't think anyone here disagrees. The only problem is how you've chosen to present yourself:
I don't think you believe anything in this quote. It's a kind of reflexive religion-talk. In any case, this and the previous quote illustrate The Two Crotales. One wields pseudoscience as a weapon, the other believes religion is just a means to personal fulfillment. One pits religion against science, the other laments any comparison.
If you think religion is just a comforting bedtime story, you shouldn't present it like a superior variety of science. You shouldn't pretend that it can answer questions about the natural world. When you do that, you upset anyone who knows the first thing about science. You are, in effect, shrugging your shoulders at the foundation of all knowledge.