That may be a good idea, but I nor any of the BMA (I hope) condones a ban.
Certainly, an administrator (unfortunately) reserves the right to ban somebody, but the purpose of TK'ing somebody is the same as rape: Power. So jail does nothing to take the power from a rapist, but only fills him with more anger and hatred, so does a ban. What stops rapists? Women with guns, that's what fu<i></i>cking stops them.
Taking the power from a TK'er by turning him into the TK'ed utterly destroys them, a ban just makes them somebody else's problem (especially if they don't subscribe to any such blacklist.) Ultimately, they will be crushed, their little feelings hurt, etc., etc. I've seen plenty of people I've TK'ed for being TK'ers come back a day or week later, apologising. They played seriously after that. Sure, they made excuses, but they were ready to give it a serious try, and I'm not one to hold grudges.
That's how the BMA operates.
Redemption...
Through fire.
Certainly, an administrator (unfortunately) reserves the right to ban somebody, but the purpose of TK'ing somebody is the same as rape: Power. So jail does nothing to take the power from a rapist, but only fills him with more anger and hatred, so does a ban. What stops rapists? Women with guns, that's what fu<i></i>cking stops them.
Taking the power from a TK'er by turning him into the TK'ed utterly destroys them, a ban just makes them somebody else's problem (especially if they don't subscribe to any such blacklist.) Ultimately, they will be crushed, their little feelings hurt, etc., etc. I've seen plenty of people I've TK'ed for being TK'ers come back a day or week later, apologising. They played seriously after that. Sure, they made excuses, but they were ready to give it a serious try, and I'm not one to hold grudges.
That's how the BMA operates.
Redemption...
Through fire.