Well, I thought GH3 was terrible and not fun. I think I know the reason for this.Guitar Hero has gone down hill. Guitar Hero 3 was perfect, they had every little problem figured out and the songs didn't get boring too quick. Then they copy Rock Band and it's just boring. The gameplay is all messed up, and it's like they just want to be Rock Band. I end up playing more Rock Band 2 than I do any Guitar Hero now. Expert isn't even that difficult on Rock Band, but it's a hell of a lot better than playing a flawed and boring modern rushed release from Guitar Hero.
After GH2/80s, Activision bought Red Octane (dev), and therefore got the ip, which they then passed to Neversoft (who had only really made Tony Hawk games). Activision has whored out the GH franchise for gobs of money.
Check this out.
- Guitar Hero 3 - 2007 (late)
- Guitar Hero: Aerosmith - June 2008
- Guitar Hero World Tour - October 2008
- Guitar Hero: Metallica - March 2008
- Guitar Hero 5 - September 1, 2009
- Guitar Hero: On Tour - June 2008
- Guitar Hero: On Tour: Decades
FFS, they're publishing at least two titles a year!
I know that Harmonix doesn't have the uberdifficult note charts that the GH series has evolved into having since GH3, but they are at least fun. I think that owes to the fact that Harmonix is composed of a lot of musicians who know what they're talking about. I think that Neversoft has been trying to copy everything that Harmonix has done (ie: they did GH1 & GH2/80s, and then made RB after Activision bought the GH IP out from under them) in an attempt to make money hand over fist. It's irritating.
Oh, and the GH series has been pushing its DLC just as much as the RB series... but I'm interested to see if it will be possible to use the GH DLC between games like the RB series allows.