www.tinyurl.com/638s9f go ahead and click this link. It's a video and images of the new UT4 beta.
This was my point. Someone, anywhere can post the FBI pedo link, and say that it's something else. Unknowing gamers (thousands of them) would click that link expecting UT4 beta images or something. Then what.
You miss the point. This link wasn't just thrown out at random. It wasn't
www.unrealtournament4beta.com, etc. It was posted as: "here is one of my favs- 4yo he with dad (toddler, some oral, some anal)- supercute! Havent' seen her on the board before- if anyone has anymore, PLEASE POST." and the link was ".../4yo_suck" Is there really an argument going on that someone was pranking with this link? Honestly?
I hear your point, the thing is, it has no grounding in reality. If this were something that was accidentally left fallow for a few years and someone haphazardly clicked on, that's one thing, but that's not what happened. It was explicitly labeled and clicked on the same day it was posted (and the next day from the same IP). This link was heavily contextualized and you postulating that someone
could have reposted it as a joke is just silly. If that were the case there would have been a gaggle of people who would have been raided, only to find no child porn on their computers. Since the lawyer vigorously defending the pedophile didn't imply this in any way had happened, it's a very safe bet that it's simply not the case.
So, yeah, I don't live in reality because I think that a person clicking on 4yo_suck with an explicit advertisement for what it contained constitutes probable cause to search the premises.
~Jason