Anti-Establishmentarianism discussion

  • Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.

lucifix

I did something m0tarded and now I have read only access! :(
Nov 3, 2001
2,427
1
0
45
A Deeper Kind Of Slumber
www.geocities.com
Originally posted by Stilgar
Interesting topic.. I had some ramblings with a friend about this sort of ignorant backlash last night... I'll use an aquaintence as an example.

Ok... so this person hates McDonalds, and I'm not talking the general dislike of the crappy ads, colour scheme, food :D that's prevelant through much of society... just an unbridled hate of eveything it is and stands for.... including its employe's. So here he is at a 21st...badgering a couple who happened to meet each other while working for McDs, calling them "drones" and whining about them feeding "the machine" ( completely oblivious to the alchohol he just purchased, the clothes on his back... etc )
I guess the crux of the matter was that he couldn't seperate morality from necessity. The couple didnt really like McDs or its 'cause' ....Infact one of them hates it, but fast food joints are going to exist no matter who's in charge, and making money its just a way of surviving in a capitalist society.... that's the only justification they needed.... but he insisted on fighting his little moral battle against McDs... for the 'good' of the rest of us I assume.... oblivious to how much of an ass he was making of himself.

In saying this I should also note that I really can't relate to how much cynicism there apparently is in the US ?
Angst ridden teens are popular on new zealand tv (read american tv interspersed with local shows) but I believe that's a poor indication of what to expect from a national psyche half way around the world.
Cactus if you could provide some more examples of the problem you're talikng about then maybe I can contribute something slightly more interesting to this discussion :>
i use to hate mcd's too, but now every time we go out our son drags us to "donnies" as he call's it :lol:
 

Akuma

Deacon Massif
Mar 4, 2000
929
0
0
Visit site
you can thank the Founding Fathers for fundamentally fucking with the psyche of your country - its the twisted puritanism that means it's ok to show arnie killing gooks and ragheads on prime time tv, but to show nudity would be unchristian.

In some respects the US isn't that different from any other fundamentalist country.
 

Stilgar

Ninja
Dec 20, 1999
2,505
1
0
Toitle
Visit site
Originally posted by lucifix
whats the difference in taking a woman out,showing her a good time,buyin her expensive gifts and offering her $$$ for her company? i dont see one bit of fucking difference.......

one guy probably wants a relationship, the other just wants to stick his dick in her crack(s)...
that's about the only difference I can see at th emo.... that and taxation
 
S

SpiritWalker

Guest
well....

Cactus..
AGREED!!!! and your response was very clear, and intelligent as apposed to :D


Originally posted by lucifix
insted of bitching about porn shops maybe we should bitch about getting guns out of the hands of children. I honestly cant remember the last death/murder/suicide caused by porn :p

Not ment as a flame..

the way to get guns out of the hands of childeren is... (drum roll please)...
have the parents be parents!!!
As a parent if feel that it is my job/responsibility to
1. Know where my son is 24/7
2. Listen to what he has to say (when he starts talking :D )
3. Be aware of "changes" in his personality.
4. Know who he "hangs" with..
5. To be the teacher of right/wrong.. and provide the moral/spiritual "measuring stick" of right/wrong
6. let my son know that NO MATTER WHAT he will always be loved
I may not like something that he has done... but that's ok
7. Know what his school life is like and to take an active part in it.
it is NOT a teachers job to rasie my son (or the t.v.s).

I think that is parents would make time in their lives, and quite being so damn selfish, and to wrapped up in their problems, then you wouldn't see kids having kids, things like Columbine, rampant drug use and the like..
 
S

SpiritWalker

Guest
well... IMO

Originally posted by lucifix
i didnt say i didnt care...it really shouldnt happen. what i meant was the whole world will never be on the same page so as long as it doesnt directly affect me i can deal with it. personally i think america is going to become just as bad if not worse than 3rd world countries....imo.......

It's opions like that that make me want to say.. then head to a 3rd world country for awhile.. see how you like it..

are you actually saying that if if dosen't affect me then I don't care??
WOW how naive can you be..
think about this...
You are walking down a mountain pass.. following a bunch of other hikers ..maybe 10.. and you see the first one get smashed to a plup by a rock slide... that dosen't affect you.. and then you see the 2 one get killed the same way.. and you think again.. dosen't affect me.. 3rd, 4th, and so on..now you are the last one.. and as you look up and see the rocks come crashing down..
I BET you would think.. "hmmmm... why didn't some one warn me about this.."

Life affects Life.. if you are wise enough to see it
 
S

SpiritWalker

Guest
Originally posted by @kuma

In some respects the US isn't that different from any other fundamentalist country.

Preach it!!! Brudda!! Preach it!!!
 

Frostblood

Strangely compelling...
Mar 18, 2001
2,126
0
0
Blighty
"you can thank the Founding Fathers for fundamentally ****ing with the psyche of your country - its the twisted puritanism that means it's ok to show arnie killing gooks and ragheads on prime time tv, but to show nudity would be unchristian.

In some respects the US isn't that different from any other fundamentalist country."


Theres nothing in the bible that says "thou shalt not see a naked woman". In fact, some could argue that genesis encourages naturism ( the only time nudity became a problem is after adam and eve disobeyed God ). But this thread wasnt meant to turn into a religous discussion..,

As for McD's...frankly, I do hate them...they're exploitative, money grabbing and low quality. But I wouldn't dream of insulting any of the employees...they're the ones getting underpayed, and I'm sure they wouldnt work there if they could help it ( there is a joke in england, sadly rather true : "what do you say to a black person with a job?" "Big mac and fries please." ). The guy you described was an idiot. But that doesnt mean there isnt a problem...
 

Cactus

The Evil Spatula
Mar 19, 2000
1,970
2
0
43
Ithaca (A.K.A. Cornell's Bitch) NY
Originally posted by lucifix
uh, which "problem" are you refering to? if its porn, thats because porn shops ARENT a problem. and as far as the little kids getting theire hands chopped off in another country, well thats another country............

the problem i refer to is one you would realize if you actually read my post.

my first post had NOTHING to do with pornography, the topic of this thread had NOTHING to do with pornography, i merely mentioned the time square initiative as a political policy/plan, in passing, please do not mince words with me on the subject. you're missing the forest for the trees, please re-read the whole post before forming conclusions on what i'm saying. i also mentioned starving children in Uganda, perhaps you want to get into a detailed argument with me on that one too?
 

Cactus

The Evil Spatula
Mar 19, 2000
1,970
2
0
43
Ithaca (A.K.A. Cornell's Bitch) NY
ALRIGHT LISTEN TO WHAT THE WHOLE F*CKING POINT IS PEOPLE: this is a thread about anti-establismentarianism, NOT F(_)CKING PORNOGRAPHY! READ THE FIRST GODDAMN POST AND YOU"LL UNDERSTAND!!

this is the last time i say this. i'm not directing this at anyone but please please for the love of God, i'm not in the mood to have microscopic arguments about macroscopic policies. i have neither the time nor the energy to start a thread, and then for the next month continuously repeat what i said in the first post because people refuse to read it.
 
S

SpiritWalker

Guest
hehehe.. sorry if me starting the porn sub-thread is off topic.. I just was pointing out a small thing..
 

Cactus

The Evil Spatula
Mar 19, 2000
1,970
2
0
43
Ithaca (A.K.A. Cornell's Bitch) NY
the question of pornography is legitimate to the point that it requires a discussion on wehther or not it warrants a policy such as the time square initiative. it is not legitimate when it becomes a question of if porn itself is decent/ acceptable/ legal, because it has nothing to do with the question originally posed.

furthermore, i think it's stupid to say that we shouldn't worry about porn because there are bigger problems. if my water heater broke, yes, it pales in comparrison to problems like people getting stabbed in the streets, but does that diminish any legitimacy of the problem that my water heater broke and that my landlord should fix it? not at all, and arguing such things is trivial and non-sensical. am i not to complain about my lack of shower water because some people are being stabbed? it would be nice if people neither got stabbed nor have no hot water, but that has no bearing on the merits of the discussion and the question at hand of having no hot water. i feel the pain of teh stabbing victim, but that discussion is parallel and cannot be held in precedent to the immediate concern of me not being able to bath.
 

Claw

Weird little hermit on dried frog pills
Nov 3, 2001
929
0
0
Visit site
Originally posted by Cactus
(...) because we want a landmark to be the defining symbol of the character and principles of a country, things we are proud of, and we are certainly not going to show sex shops as our best face forward.

sounds like you're not a great one for honesty, eh? :rolleyes:
'cept for the proudness part this is a vote for sex shops close to landmarks. Because we like sex and do not fell shame for it. Or are we? :p


furthermore, i think it's stupid to say that we shouldn't worry about porn because there are bigger problems.

I actually believe what he really wanted to say is that porn isn't a problem at all...

And your post concerning the time square initiative included the remark that you support it, so although you deny it (not quoted) the topic is porn, as a sub-topic at least, and some ppl decided to remark on that topic rather than the original topic.
And I'd like to remark that I also believe porn is neither a problem nor does it attract any "shady" business. Not in Germany at least, where porn shops can be found just in the middle of our main shopping streets and are usually ignored by ppl 'cept the customers of course, just like most other stores. And while prostitution isn't legal in Germany, it is "tolerated" and many a prostitute will tell you that is a damn good thing 'cos they can now run a bothrel without a pimp (?) which means they can earn a decent wage like ppl in normal jobs.


Ahh, there are so many li'll remarks or longish rants I'dlike to make in response to many posts herein... but it's goddamn late this side of the ocean, maybe tomorrow. I'll propably forget. :rolleyes:
 

Cactus

The Evil Spatula
Mar 19, 2000
1,970
2
0
43
Ithaca (A.K.A. Cornell's Bitch) NY
point taken. i should clarify. my liberal use of the word "porn" is an oversimplification that is going to haunt me, so i'm going to try to explain it here. pornography, in of itself is fine. peep shows, fine too, strip bars, legitimate businesses. i think the best word to characterize really time square before the time square intitiative, is not "row of porn shops" but rather, "red light district" which has a different meaning in the US than in the rest of the world. in the US, it seems to include porn shops, etc. in the rest of the world however, red light district basically means prostitution, and such shady business.

that's just a clarification, also in regard to prostitution, it wouldn't be so shady if not coupled with the rampant drug use, the crack epidemic, and the explosion of STD's during the 80's. i believe it is a combination of all these things that tarnishes the reputation of time-square. during the 80's, we didn't exactly have unionized prostitutes, nor systematic testing for STD's, nor do we have now, which is what makes it a problem.

i think the problem with time square before the intitiative was the fact that it was a red light district of the worst variety. coupled with all those bad things. and in reality, cleaning up time square was like driving the snakes out of ireland.

i hope that clarifies, firstly that i misused the word "porn" second, i'm talking about new york's days where there was a problem when the red light district was coupled with other bad things.

thirdly, you have to realize that time square, at that time was a terrible neighborhood, i mean there wasn't just a crack epidemic or STD transmission problem localized to that area, it was afflicting the whole nation, yet neighborhoods without porn shops seemed to have been far better off in those times than neighborhoods WITH porn shops. and that says to me that the red light district in new york was definately drawing unsavory crowds. in a world where everything is bad, it just so happened that the neighborhood with the porn shops were far worse. i think that's proof enough. i'm sure that in germany if you had a cluster of sex shops, 10 blocks in a row, there would also be attracting many unsavory types.

also the national monument thing, if people were walking around the lincoln memorial, or the holocaust museum, asking if anyone wanted to buy some CRACK, i'm sure that's a poor reflection of the spirit of hte nation, i don't think you can deny it, i mean do you think that any nation would want to come out and say, "yeah, come to our country, you can get lots of crack!" also along those lines, consider this, the areas around time square are tourist attractions, tourists come out in groups and families. how can a red light district be good for tourism? for attracting business and talent and the image of new york? a lot of income in new york is from tourism, why would a family want to bring their kids to new york to walk through a 10 block area where they are offered cocaine, heroin and casual sex? all those things are associated with New York and time square in teh 80's.

i think people are getting into the semantics of what i'm saying instead of focusing on the time square initiative itself. it was not only a program to get rid of sex shops but to overall clean up time squre, getting rid of hte crack, the hookers, the pimps the gangsters, and making it more tourist friendly, and improving the new york image. i'm FOR that program. regardless of your feelings towards porn, can you really say that the initiative itself was BAD for new york city? i don't think so. i've seen enough positive changes for me to vote for Rudy as mayor for life. because i knew how it was before, and i've seen it now, and it's better than ever.
 

lucifix

I did something m0tarded and now I have read only access! :(
Nov 3, 2001
2,427
1
0
45
A Deeper Kind Of Slumber
www.geocities.com
Re: well... IMO

Originally posted by The Spiritwalker


It's opions like that that make me want to say.. then head to a 3rd world country for awhile.. see how you like it..

are you actually saying that if if dosen't affect me then I don't care??
WOW how naive can you be..
think about this...
You are walking down a mountain pass.. following a bunch of other hikers ..maybe 10.. and you see the first one get smashed to a plup by a rock slide... that dosen't affect you.. and then you see the 2 one get killed the same way.. and you think again.. dosen't affect me.. 3rd, 4th, and so on..now you are the last one.. and as you look up and see the rocks come crashing down..
I BET you would think.. "hmmmm... why didn't some one warn me about this.."

Life affects Life.. if you are wise enough to see it
that is completely idiotic and not what i meant. does it bother you every time someone is killed? if so i bet you never have a restful day. and all this **** does not bother me, i obey/follow no one but myself. all the organizations/laws/morals/religions/bullshit mean nothing to me.
 

lucifix

I did something m0tarded and now I have read only access! :(
Nov 3, 2001
2,427
1
0
45
A Deeper Kind Of Slumber
www.geocities.com
and as far as the dumb little bastards who allow their hands to get chopped of deserve it. i f you dont try to stop somthing it will happen. if i were in that situation i would have kicked the fucker in the nuts a nd took my chances....insted of standing there waiting for my hands to be lobbed off..........cruel i know, but if you allow it........the way i see it is if you let somthing happen it will happen and if you let people take control/power over you then you are already dead in my eyes..........
 
S

SpiritWalker

Guest
HAHAHAHAHA!! YOU are a very funny young "man" this is a public forum devil boy.. get over yourself...LOL....
and yes it does bother me when a person dies.. but I also know that bad things happen.. sometime the "bad thing" is deserved, and if so I appalud it.. but when a person is murdered.. that is just plain sad..
as for you...
I would be willing to bet that you are 15-25.. still at home, no real job, no real future, no real girl in your life (rosey don't count), and for some reason you seem to belive that if it dosen't affect you then it dosen't matter... and maybe one day if you are lucky.. you will see that like I said..

Life affects life...

consider yourself schooled devil-boy..

you know you are starting to remind me of Aero.. but at least he could be open minded
 

Cactus

The Evil Spatula
Mar 19, 2000
1,970
2
0
43
Ithaca (A.K.A. Cornell's Bitch) NY
[at lucifix]


hmmm, good reply to my pornography posts.

i have a problem with people who think they don't have to obey societal morals also. it's absolutely stupid to think that your actions can't be dictated by the government or your fellow man, or that their opinion has no bearing in your decision. you truly think you can be an independent creature? then why are you on the internet? the whole premise of the internet is that it's a community. community = society, community must exist within some confines of a social norm. humans are inherently social, no matter how much they like being alone. it's selfish to think that you simply can live free from other people. why are you on this BBS? if you're not social to begin with, or you don't obey society rules? being social requires you to obey constraints.

it's absolutely ridiculous to say taht if people don't like what they're subjected to, they should just rebel. it's so easy to say isn't it? i don't like the moon, we should blow it out of the sky. it's quite another when you have the muzzle of an AK 47 pointed in your face. you're talking tall, holding onto principle and being high and mighty, but in reality you've never encountered such a situation, and as such you have no right to judge the others in that situation. you have such a simplified and glorified view of how life should be, that it's almost comical. and i suppose that it's a good aspect of this country that people are allowed to be so detached from reality. you don't seem to be able to recognize that there are simply times in life when someone beats you and and you have no means to fight back.

and please don't reply in that fashion to anyone in my thread, it's unbecoming, and you are attacking the person, not the idea, you embody what is wrong with this country, people who always think they know better, people who always think they have the solution, people who think they're just inherently more right than others, gives not a second thought to the social structure and confine in which they live, act in arrogance and haste iwth their feet in the clouds and their heads up their asses. and THAT my friend, is the point of my original post, that people who have no idea how hard it is to make the world work, or how difficult it is to be pragmatic, think it fit to attack other people's ideas, tear down their work, becasue they think they know better, when they really know so little.
 
S

SpiritWalker

Guest
Re: Re: well... IMO

Originally posted by lucifix
i obey/follow no one but myself. all the organizations/laws/morals/religions/bullshit mean nothing to me.

and that is your problem devil-boy...
kinda like the jew in pre-nazi germany.. they saw some of what was going onbut either didn't see the writing on the walls or didn't care what was happening in their own land.. and look what happened to them..

maybe the law banning people like you from having computers and inflicting yourself on intelligent peoples will sneek up on you.. and I wonder if anyone would care..
 
S

SpiritWalker

Guest
For Cactus

Originally posted by Cactus
........... and THAT my friend, is the point of my original post, that people who have no idea how hard it is to make the world work, or how difficult it is to be pragmatic, think it fit to attack other people's ideas, tear down their work, becasue they think they know better, when they really know so little.

/me gives golf claps to Cactus for this and the other well thought out replies that he seems to have coming out of his orrifices lately..

I would like to be able to do that as quickly... but I have to think at it more than him