I think this is the issue that the international community is slowly starting to realize.
I'm still very sure its just the US and Israel at this point.
I think this is the issue that the international community is slowly starting to realize.
actually Sarkozy and Brown talked a lot tougher than Obama did (on Friday).I'm still very sure its just the US and Israel at this point.
Those smileys just show your ignorance since Benfica has a very valid point.
I think we care too much, personally. I'd be okay with just closing our bases, withdrawing to our own soil and telling everyone else "good luck"
Ok, a better one:kiff said:
There was a little "rumor" yesterday, on Deutsche Welle that a "special committee of expert is examining the option of getting rid of Ahmadinejad and replacing him with a Right wing conservative, Ghalibaf". Ghalibaf was a contender of presidential election in 2005, is an ardent supporter of Khamenei, hates Ahmadinejad's guts--as tape recorded in a private meeting--and is a relatively liked mayor of Tehran, thus likely to calm down the inflamed capitol. Someone (I cannot now recall who) speculated three possibilities that will get rid of Ahmadinejad, while saving the regime's face:
His voluntary resignation
His death or illness
His parliamentary impeachment
I like how there is an American flag on Pakistan, who hates us, and only rarely and begrudgingly works with us. (By us I mean the allies)
Not sure if this has been mentioned, but Israel has preemptively bombed perceived nuclear threats before.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/june/7/newsid_3014000/3014623.stm
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/02/11/080211fa_fact_hersh
I'd be surprised if Israel didn't take some kind of action.
good question... it just seems inevitable someone will. no?why there is no none of them choice?
Nuke em just like the whales.