Tim Sweeney Excited About Intel's Larrabee

  • Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.

Severin

New Member
Feb 8, 2008
199
0
0
So is Larrabee going into next gen consoles ? otherwise why the excitement from epic ?

Not really knocking Epic, but they said themselves that UE4 is aimed fairly and squarely at consoles with the Pc added afterwards as a bolt on. You know like the Linux version of UT3. (yes that last bit is having a go)
 
Last edited:

MonsOlympus

Active Member
May 27, 2004
2,225
0
36
43
Maybe Epic knows something from Intel the rest of us dont know, theyd have to know something on the direction of the next consoles being close with MS and Sony as well.

Its possible Intel will try to take on IBM's cell tech in the console race next round, then again they could be looking to push Mac as a gaming platform.

Who knows! Right now all us little people can do is speculate I guess, perhaps the motives behind why who likes what wont be revealed for a few years yet :(
 
Last edited:

Sir_Brizz

Administrator
Staff member
Feb 3, 2000
26,021
86
48
So is Larrabee going into next gen consoles ? otherwise why the excitement from epic ?

Not really knocking Epic, but they said themselves that UE4 is aimed fairly and squarely at consoles with the Pc added afterwards as a bolt on. You know like the Linux version of UT3. (yes that last bit is having a go)
Not really. They will probably focus UE4's development on consoles, but they will still dvelop on PCs... and UE3's optimization for consoles has only really helped it on PC.
 

MonsOlympus

Active Member
May 27, 2004
2,225
0
36
43
Well if the Larrabee and Intel Corei7 perform well enough you could see consoles moving that way over the Ati or Nvidia selection. We've seen chipset makers dropping out so it wouldnt surprise me if Intel are aiming to make an all in one solution, with that there will be a level of consistency they can keep that a mix of company's might find hard to match.

Since that is the same tech that PC will be using it might make things even easier for developers wanting to do multiplatform titles, more so than the 360 which is apparently pretty easy.

Then again the Larrabee might just not hold up against Ati or Nvidia's graphics solutions, I still think Intel is a prime position given they do chipsets, CPU's and now pushing more into graphics. Theres also the possibility of Intel CPU's finding their way into the next range of consoles even with Nvidia or Ati graphics.

What Im waiting to hear on is updates to the tech consoles are currently using, we hear how much PC tech is moving forwards...
 

Severin

New Member
Feb 8, 2008
199
0
0
From what I've read Larrabee won't really compete with Nvidia & AMD/ATI by the time its released. Its only slightly better than thier current generation of tech and its a good year away yet.

Ps. Core i7 is looking like its not going to be a huge step up for gamers or home users. Its main focus seems to be killing off the last of AMD's strongholds i.e. the server market.

It will be better than the current Core based chips but not like the change from P4 to Core2.

@ Sir Brizz

You can develop just about anything for just about any system on the Pc. It does not follow that the product will take full advantage of the hardware or for that matter work at all on the system it was developed on only on the system it was developed for. Big difference there.

Given a decent compiler you could develop for Pc on an iphone. I bet the iphone won't run Crysis.
 
Last edited:

DannyMeister

UT3 Jailbreak Coder
Dec 11, 2002
1,275
1
38
41
Bolivar, Missouri
Today's Intel graphics are about on par with 2001 graphics cards for the most part. Moving that up to 2006 is only going to fix the problem for so long (maybe a year).

I'm assuming 1st generation larrabee will be exactly that... 1st generation. Hopefully the next go-round will improve the situation even more. Of course, I was holding out for the second generation of physx cards, and look what happened.
 

MonsOlympus

Active Member
May 27, 2004
2,225
0
36
43
From what I've read Larrabee won't really compete with Nvidia & AMD/ATI by the time its released. Its only slightly better than thier current generation of tech and its a good year away yet.

Ps. Core i7 is looking like its not going to be a huge step up for gamers or home users. Its main focus seems to be killing off the last of AMD's strongholds i.e. the server market.

It will be better than the current Core based chips but not like the change from P4 to Core2.

Yeah I kinda know that but Im looking further down the track after that tech is tried out in the PC arena first then we'll start seeing 2nd, 3rd gen larrabee's which might give nvidia's and ati's midrange offers a good run for their moneys worth. In the lowrange Intel could fight em both off, I mean they both do good at providing cheap alternatives but from what Intel and Core showed me is that they can do it better, cheaper and at a better price.

Which is more what the console market is about, none of the current ones have the highest end (at the time) graphics hardware. They arnt shabby by any means though but the software is made with those specifications in mind.

Anyways onto my point, is what happens you you get a 3rd gen (we'll say just for now) larrabee with a i7core right...

And make it a bluechip intel only box? I think the performance you would see would be impressive to say the least and the cost would be decent by the time the next set of consoles are starting to come together.

I think Intel could get a very complex console architecture going with the load balancing and scalability of their chips I just see a future in that :cool:
 
Last edited: