Supreme Court: child hentai = CP

[Jacks:Revenge]

this is a textbook example of "thought crime", and as tasteless as cartoons can be, enforcing "thought crime" is even more tasteless, not to mention dangerous.

Best answer.

 

[T2A`]

Hey, now. That's what I said 30 posts ago, only I applied gratuitous amounts of hyperbole to it in hopes people might draw the proper conclusion.

Unfortunately, I forgot most people here never, ever get it right and need it all spelled out for them.

 

[Jacks:Revenge]

Hey, now. Sorry I didn't give the official "person who had the best answer" award to its apparent proper owner.
But I haven't actually read every post in this thread, I guess yours was one of them. Has nothing to do with needing things spelled out. Your little back-n-forth with Kantham is easily understandable.

but it was funny to watch everyone from Down Undah' get pissed off about their Aussie pride after you called them idiots :tup:

 

[zynthetic]

There's several sides of the argument against this judgment, unfortunately due to people it will effect directly I don't think the majority of their argument will hold any legal or popular merit. The other, well; the decision in which how it was worded, the images being people in the eyes of the law, very well opens the opportunity to grant fictional characters human rights, is very wtf.

 

[Grobut]

The other, well; the decision in which how it was worded, the images being people in the eyes of the law, very well opens the opportunity to grant fictional characters human rights, is very wtf.

I haden't even considdered that aspect of it, but yeah, i guess it does open that door... ohh what delightfull messes that can come out of that!

 

[Zur]

Anyone feel like launching a new web site ? You could ask for Matt Groening's approval.

www.humanrightsforsimpsons.org

 

[theabyss]

Hey, now. Sorry I didn't give the official "person who had the best answer" award to its apparent proper owner.

There you go:

 

[Grobut]

Preeeeciooous... MINE! T2A can't have cuts.

 

[T2A`]

That's fine. This one has a grammatical error.

 

[Jacks:Revenge]

You know what happens when you commit grammatical errors, don't you?
Your soul becomes trapped forever in...

GRAMMATICA

which is like, a really scary place. that you definitely do NOT want to be in.
like Australia. or Kanada.

 

[Darkdrium]

Kanada isn't a scary place... :'(

 

[T2A`]

In Soviet Kanada grammatical error commits you?

 

[Kantham]

It's not illegal to be nude, it's not illegal to be filmed nude (no matter the age) but it is illegal to be filmed/photographed underage if you are performing a sexual act.

If we go that route, it is legal to visualize teenagers naked and share the content on the net.

 

[JaFO]

I wonder what the ruling would have been if the pictures/cartoons/movies had involved the various characters murdering and killing each other ...

Or is the fact that it somehow is related to sex enough to make it a crime by default ?

One has to wonder what kind of message that is (violence = ok, sex = not ? murder is not bad ? showing your sausage is ?).

 

[phatcat]

OH F*** ME!! D:

 

[dotnetbeast]

I know this is a serious thread...but I thought CP meant "colored people" you know, like CP Time?

 

[phatcat]

wait.
does hermaphrodite cub diaper porn count?

 

[Jacks:Revenge]

I thought CP meant "colored people" you know, like CP Time?

So you came into this thread with the presumption that the Supreme Court has ruled child hentai = colored people?

 

[Hadmar]

wait.
does hermaphrodite cub diaper porn count?

Dunno, but your avatar is more than just suggestive and doesn't look 18+ so you are in big trouble mister.

 

[phatcat]

So you came into this thread with the presumption that the Supreme Court has ruled child hentai = colored people?

f'ing colored people. You purple people, get out of my country!

Dunno, but your avatar is more than just suggestive and doesn't look 18+ so you are in big trouble mister.

oh yeah, hot.