I tend to disagree on this one.Birelli said:Well, looks like you got your answer tarq
Congrats to CTM, I don't think anyone was expecting that kind of performance
As Ctm got two players from Tarts to help them. 
Results Discussion
- Thread starter Spudsy
- Start date
-
Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.
As Ctm got two players from Tarts to help them. 
Eh, I'm still impressed, two players doesn't make a team, and a team of 5 players that haven't played together before will never be as strong (although admittedly almost none of the teams in this tourney have played together much, TEZC included).
Right, and not to take anything away from CTM, but me and 4WD were top three scorers constantly. He was 3rd and 2nd twice and I was 1st twice and 4th once. Not to brag or anything but on Crusher 2 I had another dominating performance and 4WD dominating in the release category all three games. CTM definately won cause of Tart help. I wouldn't count them as being a weak team however, knowing that the same team gave me and 4WD, with three other Tart members, problems in the opening match of our (Tart) season. However, after these fights, CTM seemed to fall more and more apart. CTM is good, but they don't have the strategy to win some of these matches. CTM is now 1-3 in a 6 game season however, which worries me about a possible presence in the semi-finals. Spaz is sitting in a tight spot right now, and I would be willing to freelance for him to get him out of it in the future. Moving on to other teams. Nice job today Tarts! We did ourselves proud!
spudsy => hint: i was third in all those matches againt usg. & individual scores arent that important, winning the map is wich counts at the end
tbh i think usg would hve performed way better if they hve got a better ping. (around 135 compared to 70 does make a difference)
tbh i think usg would hve performed way better if they hve got a better ping. (around 135 compared to 70 does make a difference)
Hmmm ... I'm getting pretty tempted here to change a rule for the upcomming matches ...Spudsy said:
Yeah 4WD i think you're right on the ping, they did have problems in that category. To be honest with everyone, I simply talk about and look at individual scores as a means on evaluating the person during a match since I obviously can't spectate them all the time. Anywho, it's all fun, and fun it was today! I look forward to what tomorrow has in store for us all. Hopefully that's another Tart win!
4WD said:spudsy => hint: i was third in all those matches againt usg. & individual scores arent that important, winning the map is wich counts at the end
tbh i think usg would hve performed way better if they hve got a better ping. (around 135 compared to 70 does make a difference)
I agree with you 4WD, winning as a team is more important. I am sure USG would have played a lot better if their ping was good. We as a team have played against them and I know that that match was great.
Spudsy said:
I think that you are right CoolDude and I feel we must change some parts of the rules:CoolDude said:
Old In case of emergency, it is allowed to use players not listed on the sign-up list (remember it is a FUN Tournament). Preferably these players are not part of other teams participating in the tournament.
New In case of emergency, it is allowed to use players not listed on the sign-up list (remember it is a FUN Tournament). These players may not be part of other teams participating in the tournament
If you don't have a compleet team and you can't find freelancers, you can choose to play with 4 players or forfeit. A team of 3 players will not be accepted.
This measure has to be taken because of some players from other teams falling in and trying to take the credit for the whole team winning.
In-game shots, do you want me to:tarquin said:
a) Send them to Rev for POTW (which will be showing 1 pic a week only)?
b) Send them to you (Tarquin) for the newsposts?
c) Post them here (and you can pick them yourself if needed)?
For the newsposts I'm happy to pick them off here.
Will you want to post them all on the PJB feature article eventually, like you did for last year's tourney?
If so, you can send me them all in one zipfile at the end of the tourney. If all the images have standard filenames then I can adapt the perl script I'm using for the results tables to make the links automatically. (eg last year the images were "001-03.jpeg" for match number and map 1-3.)
Will you want to post them all on the PJB feature article eventually, like you did for last year's tourney?
If so, you can send me them all in one zipfile at the end of the tourney. If all the images have standard filenames then I can adapt the perl script I'm using for the results tables to make the links automatically. (eg last year the images were "001-03.jpeg" for match number and map 1-3.)
Ooo, controversy. I like that
I'm personally in favour of the rule change.
Edit:
Oh, and tarquin, don't forget to keep pimping the BU Sidebar with the tournament news
I'm personally in favour of the rule change.
Well, since I'm back at home, I'm now available for freelancingmrloper said:
Edit:
Oh, and tarquin, don't forget to keep pimping the BU Sidebar with the tournament news
Last edited:
ZedMaestro said:Oh, and tarquin, don't forget to keep pimping the BU Sidebar with the tournament news
Done. And I'll be posting about your latest beta release in the next few days too.
The match from yesterday was a "realy bad joke" against USG, we where not played against CTM but just against some other teams. We have a lot of USG's who was verry anger after this strange matche.
Huh.. hey there where unplayable for USG's due to their nightmare connectivity.. thats good for us ?! Is that a fun tourney ?!
Huh.. spudsy and 4WD make all the difference, thats good for CTM.. We dont want to play against tarts, just play agains CTM.
I think that this tournament goes into a strange way this year.. taking avantage of a match because you got not enough players in your team or just dont let im joint for purpose knowing that great players can help ?!
All USG's ask for a canceling of the yesterday match and want to play against the real CTM's and not the Tarts or other teams.
That was just a Humiliation for USG, yes we play for fun, but yesteday it was just "no fun at all" and humiliating.
Hope this case sorted quickly.. I will contact boost about that. I'm in the way to leave the tournament and will probably never come back again !!
Huh.. hey there where unplayable for USG's due to their nightmare connectivity.. thats good for us ?! Is that a fun tourney ?!
Huh.. spudsy and 4WD make all the difference, thats good for CTM.. We dont want to play against tarts, just play agains CTM.
I think that this tournament goes into a strange way this year.. taking avantage of a match because you got not enough players in your team or just dont let im joint for purpose knowing that great players can help ?!
All USG's ask for a canceling of the yesterday match and want to play against the real CTM's and not the Tarts or other teams.
That was just a Humiliation for USG, yes we play for fun, but yesteday it was just "no fun at all" and humiliating.
Hope this case sorted quickly.. I will contact boost about that. I'm in the way to leave the tournament and will probably never come back again !!
I'll post some more screenshots of the map sometime. Check the thread soon.tarquin said:
Anyway back onto this thread; to cut to =USG=Phoenix's point, he's suggesting a rematch against CTM. Thats not a demand I'd want to consider, so I'll leave that one to the Tourney Organisers.
=USG=Phoenix said:The match from yesterday was a "realy bad joke" against USG, we where not played against CTM but just against some other teams.
Huh.. spudsy and 4WD make all the difference, thats good for CTM.. We dont want to play against tarts, just play agains CTM.
All USG's ask for a canceling of the yesterday match and want to play against the real CTM's and not the Tarts or other teams.
I see where you comming from USG and we understand the anger.
That's why the whole discussion started.
We may have started the tournament off with the wrong rule here. We did not expect this too happen (but then we should have known better).
Seeing USG already was very liniant to reschedule their game against CTM on an earlier date. I expect CTM will do the same.
The Tournament Team decided to have the game CTM-USG replayed, according to the new rules.
I will talk to both teams and get a new date for this match.
NOTE: Be friendly to other teams and even if you win, don't offend or degrade other teams!
I feel for =USG=Phoenix here.... IT does seem a little unfair that they play on the server that his team all have much larger pings. and are playing against a load of Tart players... not CTM......
I personally think a rematch should be arranged.... CTM turn up with a lack of players (bad) and get the win.... not justice imo
I personally think a rematch should be arranged.... CTM turn up with a lack of players (bad) and get the win.... not justice imo
The_Head said:
Yes i just agree, i hope we can remake this match. Sorry for flaming words, i was just stayed muted a to long time.
Some in-game shots of DF-USG:
DF-USG-001 : =USGAmraam is trying to reach the button, but struggles with DF's heavy four man defence.
DF-USG-002 : Not a pretty site for =USG=.
DF-USG-003 : =USG=shizzle "summons" a monster.
DF-USG-001 : =USGAmraam is trying to reach the button, but struggles with DF's heavy four man defence.
DF-USG-002 : Not a pretty site for =USG=.
DF-USG-003 : =USG=shizzle "summons" a monster.
Attachments
Last edited: