[pet]Owl - u out there?

[BaRrOw]

That's a rather demented look rabbit... you sure he didn't get hit by a runaway ascii raptor?

 

[BlueX]

or maybe snort some crack.....etc

 

[garbage]

(\__/)
( )
( >< )
That is a bunny! Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination.

<--- We now own this!

 

[dutch_gecko]

Looks like an owl from here. And we were asking for Owl originally, so I suppose this will do.

 

[garbage]

i'd say u need a pair of glasses geckz

 

[BaRrOw]

Nah, definately a horned owl, no doubt about it. Or maybe a really fat bat.

 

[Pinkey]

(\__/)
( )
( >< )
Definately an owl.

 

[garbage]

an owl doesnt have paws ffs!

(\__/)
( )
( >< )



and this is a bat
/\.(\__/)./\
/ (~_~) \
^^( >< )^^

//edit nvm,, cant be done here.. <_<

 

[Pinkey]

You are right but we are insinuating that "><" are wings. Being as it may, they could be clapped together for whatever reason. I will draw a picture if need be.

 

[BaRrOw]

Additionally, one could infer that the symbolism derived from the pictogram you displayed in the form of (><) could also described as the outward edges which trace in an arc-like manner being the outward bulge of huddled wings on a cold night, whereas the cross depicted in the center would merely be markings, or ruffles if you will, in the plumage of said Owl.

Which interpretation is correct? Could we lower ourselves to such baseless concepts of "right" and "wrong" when so much of the human soul is poured into this undertaking? Nay, we cannot. Being mere and helpless mortals as we are, there is but one thing certain to us:

That sure as hell is not a bunny.

 

[garbage]

;;==--- - (\__/)
;;==--- - ( )
;;==--- - ( >< )

now look what u've made me do..

 

[XMP.Arc]

Additionally, one could infer that the symbolism derived from the pictogram you displayed in the form of (><) could also described as the outward edges which trace in an arc-like manner being the outward bulge of huddled wings on a cold night, whereas the cross depicted in the center would merely be markings, or ruffles if you will, in the plumage of said Owl.

Which interpretation is correct? Could we lower ourselves to such baseless concepts of "right" and "wrong" when so much of the human soul is poured into this undertaking? Nay, we cannot. Being mere and helpless mortals as we are, there is but one thing certain to us:

That sure as hell is not a bunny.

sparrow that is deep. your analysis is extremely profound. it taps into the deeper underpinnings of xmp.

 

[Jackal]

Additionally, one could infer that the symbolism derived from the pictogram you displayed in the form of (><) could also described as the outward edges which trace in an arc-like manner being the outward bulge of huddled wings on a cold night, whereas the cross depicted in the center would merely be markings, or ruffles if you will, in the plumage of said Owl.

Which interpretation is correct? Could we lower ourselves to such baseless concepts of "right" and "wrong" when so much of the human soul is poured into this undertaking? Nay, we cannot. Being mere and helpless mortals as we are, there is but one thing certain to us:

That sure as hell is not a bunny.

WOFL!

 

[dutch_gecko]

Additionally, one could infer that the symbolism derived from the pictogram you displayed in the form of (><) could also described as the outward edges which trace in an arc-like manner being the outward bulge of huddled wings on a cold night, whereas the cross depicted in the center would merely be markings, or ruffles if you will, in the plumage of said Owl.

Which interpretation is correct? Could we lower ourselves to such baseless concepts of "right" and "wrong" when so much of the human soul is poured into this undertaking? Nay, we cannot. Being mere and helpless mortals as we are, there is but one thing certain to us:

That sure as hell is not a bunny.

Perfect.

 

[Pinkey]

Additionally, one could infer that the symbolism derived from the pictogram you displayed in the form of (><) could also described as the outward edges which trace in an arc-like manner being the outward bulge of huddled wings on a cold night, whereas the cross depicted in the center would merely be markings, or ruffles if you will, in the plumage of said Owl.

Which interpretation is correct? Could we lower ourselves to such baseless concepts of "right" and "wrong" when so much of the human soul is poured into this undertaking? Nay, we cannot. Being mere and helpless mortals as we are, there is but one thing certain to us:

That sure as hell is not a bunny.

Nicely done.

 

[GotBeer?]

;;==--- - (\__/)
;;==--- - ( )
;;==--- - ( >< )

now look what u've made me do..

Killing the owl doesn't change the fact that you did just kill an owl, and most definitely not a bunny.

 

[dutch_gecko]

That owl looks seriously shigged in italics.

 

[garbage]

Killing the owl doesn't change the fact that you did just kill an owl, and most definitely not a bunny.

as long as it's dead it's fine with me, whatever it's supposed to be..

 

[Pinkey]

Not a bunny.

 

[garbage]

neither an elephant..