Originally posted by BangOut
I can tell by the screenshots it's not a 7.
Delete the "To the author" part. It's very pretentious whether or not you've already seen it in NC reviews.
Don't do .gif review images. I like being able to see all the map pics at once at a glance.
I glanced at the review: it's very complimentary of the map.
I glanced at the screenshots: the rooms are a bunch of few-sided cylinders with platforms and crates.
^ Not a 7.
Me agrees with BO.
State your opinions, do not make corrections, only suggestions. Iif it's a AI problem then sure go ahead, that's totally objective. Like "your lift exit tags were mis-labelled" or something similar. Don't get stuck in a trap of always fixing mistakes. General comments like "your lifts weren't set up properly" and rescue the rest of the readers from the technical dietribe to ensue.
I'm sorry for ever starting using gifs in NC reviews, the pics viewed together should transpose a feeling of place and a clear indication of the maps general form. Though the only one I rember doing was for CTF-ProjectX2 because 4 pics weren't sufficent IMO. Most reviews are limited to 2 pics to ease storage, reviews by NCreviewers are 3 while admains can add a fourth, that may change with NC3.
From the pics I would say this is a "ho-hum" map. I wouldn't d/l this map as a score of 7 and your words of praise would lead me to believe I should.
Last edited: