Tell me, exactly where you see this 'compliment'. He says it should be more like CS, inferring that INF is not strategic, or as good as CS. That is not a compliment. His comment is a compliment to CS not to INF, there was nothing about INF being better, nothing complimenting the way the authors choose to make the game, if anything it was a dis to the work that the team has done for FREE.
I too play CS every now and again, and overall CS people have a big dislike for anything that is not CS, go online and ask people about INF while playing CS, Im pretty sure youll get a nasty response, I know I have. CS is fine, CS is fun, I dont need to badmouth it. But understand that INF does not want to be like CS. Understand that CS is not he be-all-end-all in games, and yes, some people might actually want to make a different game that differs from the current ones out there. Take stock in the fact that INF has been around longer, that INF has its own set of ideas, and that there is a huge amount of real life experience with weapons on the team. It is its own game, there already is a CS, and if you dont like INF, then you should go play what you like, becuase INF already has a foundation and wont be changing. Wait for the new verions to come out and give it a try before you say it needs to be like xgame/mod or whatever.
I dont condone or think its ok to call people names because they voice their opinions. To moralize a bit now, my general problem is respect. Having been on may different boards, games, etc, people say things 'virtually' that would get their teeth kicked in if they were to say it to someones face in the real world. Its real easy to look like a tough guy online, and just as easy to look like an asshole. But when you get right down to it, guess what? They are all talk.
CC
------------------
Want to be an Infiltrator? Get the goods at:
http://www.planetunreal.com/realmaps/