oooh I might look into that.
Since my last post I've read a couple books.
The Things They Carried by Tim O'Brien
This was a short, easy, and entertaining war novel based on the author's experiences in the Vietnam war. It's a series of short stories which aren't strongly connected to each other besides that they contain most of the same characters and are mostly written from the author's perspective.
There is an overall underlying theme throughout the book, which is that a true and accurate recounting of events in war is difficult and futile; that you can tell truth about war even if you are writing fiction and making stuff up. Throughout the book the author intertwines fiction and truth, occasionally doubling back and admitting that a story you read earlier was mostly or all fiction.
While I enjoyed The Things They Carried quite a bit, I ultimately disagreed with the author's premise about truth in storytelling. My personal conclusion after reading the novel was that true recounting does matter. I can't enjoy a story told as a true story if I know that it might be invented. So I was a bit disappointed overall, but it was still a great book.
The Omnivore's Dilemma, by Michael Pollan
This is from the guy who wrote The Botany of Desire, one of my favorite nonfiction books, so I was expecting something good. I got something great. The Omnivore's Dilemma is a lucid, brilliantly-presented indictment of our industrial food system - a system which bases itself completely on the logic of industrial economics rather than human and environmental health. But not only that, the book also presents a strong positive counter-example to our unhealthy food system that, in many ways, makes a lot more sense.
EVERYBODY should read this book. I learned a huge amount of interesting stuff from it and the Pollan is such a good writer, it was endlessly entertaining to read as well.
I also read....
The Princess Bride "good parts" version - Abridged by William Goldman (original by S. Morgenstern)
Apparently the original version of this book was insanely long and had tons of uninteresting stuff, but William Goldman as a child had it read to him by his father who cut out all the boring stuff, and then he got a bee in his bonnet to release this classic story in a more readable format.
It's pretty good, not a real difficult read, but to be honest I felt like Goldman kind of missed the point of Morgenstern's original. Yeah, it has lots of high adventure and love and all that, but the entire book is a satire, and even the high adventure and love and all that is written in an ironic and satirical way that sort of detracts from its believability as an adventure story. For irony and satire I'd probably want to have read the full version, even with the long boring descriptions of clothes and family lineages, and for an adventure story I would probably choose something else.
edit: ok, so I just looked at wikipedia and apparently the whole story about the book being an abridgment is a lie, it actually was written by William Goldman and none of the parts he claims to have cut out ever existed! Interestingly, this suddenly makes me like it a lot more, and kind of for the same reasons that I didn't quite enjoy The Things They Carried.