If this is TL;DR then try reading the book some time.
Against the Day by Thomas Pynchon.
FINALLY! I've been reading this 1085 novel (and it's a slow read) on and off for the past year and a half. It was entertaining, and honestly it's so huge that I'm going to back off a bit absorb what went on in that book. I think I like
Gravity's Rainbow of all of Pynchon's work the most, but this one may grow on me.
And here's a wiki dedicated to the book for ****s and giggles
Looking back at
Against the Day I'm starting to think it's one of the weaker of Pynchon's works. The problem I'd give it is that there isn't enough emotional depth in the book for me to appreciate; it seems more based on using fantastical story threads to contrast more real and dismal situations, but those real and dismal situations rarely appear in this book. It's all crazy fun in this madhouse.
Not to say there isn't a point being made. Rather, there aren't point
s being made. One antic I would stake Pynchon to be doing is taking scientific ideas and applying them in social life, and for
Against the Day the duality of light has been used in this manner. Really it is a gross oversimplification to say Pynchon is writing about social misapplications of science, but rather the way that science and technology causes changes in thought and an upheaval of standard practices. And this is only a portion of the writing that is going on.
This may actually be my least liked of Pynchon's works that I've read (
Mason and Dixion remains by my bedside waiting to be opened). In terms of rankings
Vineland and
Gravity's Rainbow top my chart for difference reasons,
V. was good,
The Crying of Lot 49 was short and bittersweet, and
Against the Day is a massive sprawl of story that doesn't give the reader the same impact as the other titles. I would recommend reading any of those titles before
Against the Day. If you have the time and patience I'd recommend reading all of them. Even at his lowest Thomas Pynchon is still an amazing author.
The worst part is that this is a book you can read multiple times and still derive different meaning. I need to reread this.
Maybe after I reread
Gravity's Rainbow
On a lighter note I finished the graphic novel adaption of the first few books from Terry Pratchett's
Discworld. Very clever, very funny, works great in illustration but makes me want to read the source text.