1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.

BeyondUnreal Reviews Duke Nukem Forever

Discussion in 'News & Articles' started by hal, Jun 20, 2011.

  1. hal

    hal Dictator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 1998
    Messages:
    21,397
    Likes Received:
    13
    Twelve or thirteen years ago, BeyondUnreal's original home was just starting to take off. Around that same time, Duke Nukem Forever switched to the Unreal Engine and began a long and troubled development cycle. Around 2009 Gearbox Software reached out to the floundering 3D Realms and helped shove the final product towards the finish line, acquiring the rights to Duke along the way.

    So here we are with game in hand. Good? Bad? Both? The game is selling very well and critics and fans are sharply split. Check out our review for one opinion.



    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]
     
  2. Alhanalem

    Alhanalem Teammember on UT3JB Bangaa Bishop

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,237
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the game was mostly slammed just for not living up to 13 years of hype. It's hardly a bad game, and it makes you laugh. It's not an amazing game, but I don't feel it deserves the panning the press is giving.
     
  3. Sir_Brizz

    Sir_Brizz Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    25,971
    Likes Received:
    66
    I think it was slammed because it's a game that feels, plays, looks and is clearly designed around 2004. Half Life 2 would take the same beating if it were released today. The game mechanics people are used to today are much more streamlined than they were back then and the game just doesn't feel that "good" for 2011.

    Now, comparing it to games in 2004, it would have been pretty good...
     
  4. Capt.Toilet

    Capt.Toilet Good news everyone!

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2004
    Messages:
    5,832
    Likes Received:
    2
    So why didn't most reviewers do that? Seems to me they just wanted to jump on the bandwagon and give it a piss poor review, which is not right. The game is obviously the version they re started back in 03-04, so review it as such.
     
  5. Twrecks

    Twrecks Spectacularly Lucky

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2000
    Messages:
    2,605
    Likes Received:
    0
    So is this a Pamela Anderson scale? 10 years ago she'd be a 9/10, in 2011 maybe a 5...

    Nice way of getting around giving an Unreal game a score :p
     
  6. Sir_Brizz

    Sir_Brizz Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    25,971
    Likes Received:
    66
    Why? The problem is, gaming has evolved. The old "drag out each level with repetitiveness" bores most people. You can't really pretend like a game came out in 2004 when it came out in 2011.

    That said, many current reviewers don't really know what gaming was like pre-2005, especially on PC. Even if they do, it's likely they don't from a critical perspective.

    And, of course, part of the problem is that the game has issues even when considered in terms of the 2004 era. I don't think it would have been more than a 7.5 game back then, so time hasn't been kind to it.
     
  7. hal

    hal Dictator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 1998
    Messages:
    21,397
    Likes Received:
    13
    Not sure if you meant the review, but we started a review or two ago not giving out scores and instead trying to present the positives and negatives.
     
  8. N1ghtmare

    N1ghtmare Sweet Dreams

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    2,411
    Likes Received:
    12
    I was actually surprised how much running and gunning I was able to do in the game, especially in comparison to other games.

    At first I thought it was going to play terribly because the level they put in the demo in my opinion is probably the worst level (in terms of game-play) in the entire game.
     
  9. Vaginal Epiphany

    Vaginal Epiphany New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2010
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    0
    Honestly, are you guys serious? This game doesn't even hold a candle to the original Unreal, not to mention anything from 2004. Completely uninspired level design, tedious back-and-forth combat (either between ammo caches in boss fights, or lol, cover) and puzzles so stupidly easy you're wondering why they're in the game in the first place.

    Ugh. No matter how you slice it, DNF is a terrible game.
     
  10. [NBK]Rattman

    [NBK]Rattman Goo God

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    460
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think was a pretty good review and pretty much how i feel about what i have played so far!
     
  11. hal

    hal Dictator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 1998
    Messages:
    21,397
    Likes Received:
    13
    I didn't see Duke in your Steam profile and I didn't see anyone say it held a candle to Unreal.

    Oh, and Unreal 2 called from 2003/04 and says hi.
     
  12. elmuerte

    elmuerte Master of Science

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2000
    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    0
    COD: Black Ops can't hold a candle to the original Unreal either, or the original Dark Forces for that matter.

    In fact, DNF is much more interesting and fun to play than COD Blops. And I also enjoyed DNF more than the original Crysis.

    Of course, those are all my opinions.
     
  13. -=WolverinE=-

    -=WolverinE=- New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2006
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    0
    The reason this game is receiving the negative reviews is that the reviewers are certainly NOT familiar with the game's history. When you play a Duke Nukem game, you HAVE to expect one liners and explicit content. This is what the game was about in the first place and DNF uses the same formula, and that's not a bad thing. Stop comparing the game to your "holy grail", and you might as well enjoy it for what it is - FUN!
     
  14. nELsOn

    nELsOn bSnakeCastShadow = True

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,306
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nice read and a really fair review imo. Basically mentioned everything I noticed while playing, pros as well as cons.

    I agree. It's simply impossible to live up to this kind of hype. I played the whole game in basically two sittings because it was just fun to play.
    One thing that definitely bothered me was the lack of blood decals though. Blood and gore is such an essential part of a Duke game imo and there's lot of it in DNF. But I never got any decals, when I stomped monsters or executed them, or parts of them hit walls... A minor detail, maybe, but there's blood on the camera and all, so...
     
  15. Capt.Toilet

    Capt.Toilet Good news everyone!

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2004
    Messages:
    5,832
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ok fair enough, but let me ask you this question. Super Mario Galaxy came out in 2007, got rave reviews, and is based on gameplay from 1996. Why wasn't it panned for having archaic gameplay, yet Duke was.
     
  16. Sir_Brizz

    Sir_Brizz Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    25,971
    Likes Received:
    66
    Because the formula for 3D platformers has pretty much worked since 1996 :) There haven't been massive changes to that formula really at all since Mario 64. Conversely, FPS games have changed a lot since 1996 both graphically and in terms of gameplay/design.
     
  17. ambershee

    ambershee Nimbusfish Rawks

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,521
    Likes Received:
    7
    Also, because it didn't suck.
     
  18. Spiney

    Spiney New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG]
     
  19. hal

    hal Dictator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 1998
    Messages:
    21,397
    Likes Received:
    13
    Yeah, and that's part of that stupid review. It's a funny, but misleading graphic because most older FPS levels were just as linear, but because of space limitations you ended up doing a lot of backtracking. Go find a key... come back to the door; rinse; repeat. It looks more complex because it folds in over on itself a lot whereas newer games aren't forced to do that so much... you're always seeing something new. Go get an actual modern FPS map and compare it to the old one instead of just using a simple line drawing versus an actual layout.

    I agree that I see way too many cutscenes these days though.
     
  20. Jacks:Revenge

    Jacks:Revenge ā• ā•£Eā•šā•šO

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2006
    Messages:
    10,054
    Likes Received:
    202
    that picture is funny because it's true. seeing it again (the Doom map on the left side) really makes me long for the good ole days.
    I don't care if you call it "backtracking."

    with modern games EVERYTHING is either open-world or a linear cutscene trap which, no matter how glorious or adrenaline packed, still takes you out of the action and makes you feel helpless. even after you get control of your character again, you're left wondering when the next scene will cut into your play. as you walk along it begins to creep into your consciousness, like you're just waiting to step on a land mine.

    why can't they design a shooter like they used to?
    WELCOME TO GAME. HERE IS BRIEFING:
    - COLORED KEYS OPEN COLORED DOORS
    - SHOOT ANYTHING THAT MOVES
    - FIND THE EXIT OR DIE TRYING

    I want big, crazy, puzzle maps with dead ends and hidden rooms and secret powerups and special weapons and hundreds of mindless enemies. I want 10 different guns that I can use at any time. I want a health bar that doesn't regenerate unless you find a health pack such that your success is dependent on speed and accuracy, not finding "cover."

    why can't they do this?
    you could still have pretty graphics and BLOOM and stuff.
    but stop trying to make everything a sandbox or a cutscene trap. why are there only 2 extremes and no middle ground?
     

Share This Page