Postal said:
You were either making reference to how the ideal of Communism is share the wealth of the people for the people, so all may prosper, but that the Soviet Dictators caused this to fail by excessive militarism; or perhaps you are compairing Kangus and Sir Socialism love of cock.
Neither, actually. I prefer Captain Capitalism. Communism works if EXERCISED CORRECTLY. But because it never is, everyone becomes equal, and incidentally, dirt poor.
But Capitalism allows for people to prosper if a) they get lucky or b) they are smart
So, let a smart, lucky, person prosper, and allow the people who don't have enough sense to get a job at McDonalds be dirt poor, and live in boxes. Which, I might add, are very comfortable. In America people can get a good job, and live in luxury (like all of us, we have computers, computers are a lixury) without too much worry. If you can't get a good job, get abetter eduacation and get that better job.
It allso allows your country to prosper technilogically. We have the free time to experiment with faster processors, and thus speed up the entire computer industry. With no incentive to prosper (your wealth from the invention will be divided up) everyone is equal, but no one has the incentive to try to make somethin better.
Sorry bout the long post, but Kangus does not love cock. Unless you speak of chicken, which, I might add, are quite tasty.