On what are you basing that assertion?
It is illegal to brew Alcohol in your garage, so to the extent I'm concerned about it already is.
Actually it's not illegal to brew beer... in small quantities (varies by state), but it is illegal to distill alcohol (must protect "Big Alcohol"!).
Edit: It is however legal to home-distill alcohol for "fuel". Wink Wink.
.
I think it's legal to "brew" small amounts, but I'm talking about production level/quality alcohol.Actually it's not illegal to brew beer... in small quantities (varies by state), but it is illegal to distill alcohol (must protect "Big Alcohol"!).
Edit: It is however legal to home-distill alcohol for "fuel". Wink Wink.
.
thats not being objective. if that was bush you would likely be laughing and using that to further paint him as an idiot.
indeed (not sure if you knew I was joking)Depends on what those regulations are, doesn't it?
Patients are to protect your ORIGINAL DESIGN of whatever you made and have been around for hundreds of years...
Not really no.
If it occurred at the beginning of W's first term under the same circumstance (the justice got ahead of himself and misspoke) then I would have no reason to laugh at him.
If it occurred like... today, after his presidency had passed. Yeah, I'd probably laugh. Only because he deserved it.
We almost lost the man to a pretzel ffs.
its on both sides but Bush got a completely unfair shake. i'm sure a Clinton led Iraq war would not have been met with such crticism. anyone here see why as an independent all of this gives me pause. i'm showing one side but it is defintely on both. but my conclusion is that Bush never got a fair shake because of that R by his name.
i think you missed my point. if lets say the oath of office was fumbled the first time Bush was elected i'm sure as time passed that would be brought up and used to paint him as an idiot.
I am not finding one elegant graph or chart, but if you want to do what I just did and dig through IRS tax statistics for the past several years, you'll find it supporting the rich-get-richer poor-get-poorer assertion. Lots of stuff readily available for combing through on the .gov site.
Prettier links with less raw data:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/05/03/earlyshow/living/money/main4068795.shtml
http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/09/news/economy/incomegap/index.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/29/business/29tax.html
If a Clinton-led Iraq War had also obviously been based on lies and misinforming the public, and Clinton had been as arrogant about it as Bush has (I'M TEH DECIDOR), it would have met with the same criticism, make no mistake. In fact, it's pretty safe to say that Clinton met with a rather large amount of criticism over getting his knob polished in the oval office and being a jacakass about it in court, which didn't involve the needless deaths of thousands and enormous national debt.
I bid you compare the reaction to the Afghanistan actions, when we were clearly going after the man most responsible for the towers, to the fallout when we then simply abandoned that and moved over to Iraq.
I'm sorry, but no, Republicans aren't victims of some vast national conspiracy.
there is so much hypocrisy though. Bush lied about WMDs is a great example. Clinton made it US policy to achieve regime change in Iraq. he assured everyone that there were WMDs there as well. i don't hear anyone calling Al Gore or Clinton liars. are they absolved of those statements simply because it was a few years earlier?
In the same, it appears Obama is going to have to go through with some decisions made under the Bush administration. There is no clear "breakage" in politics when there is a change of President.
Right on, thats why I wish him luck. I believe we should give Obama a lot of slack. Lets face it, the middle east is a huge problem that every president here on is going to have to consider and take very seriously. The situation sucks.
(Just a FYI and not being argumentative)
There is a particular problem with the molecules used in medecine or anything used in biology for that matter. Sometimes, it isn't possible to make an alternative because nothing else produces the desired effect.
When it comes to chemistry, a changed atom makes a totally different molecule. That much is obvious. But, when you get into biochemistry, a simple change in the *shape* of a molecule can make it something completely different.
For example, some molecules found in lemons and oranges are in fact the "same" molecule but with a different shape. Here's a good link that explains the basics :
http://americanhistory.si.edu/kids/molecule/04exp.htm
A problem largely of our our creation and continuation.
To win hearts and minds should we drop spray paint?