British involvement with the Iraq war.
Tony Blair is credited with taking the Brits into war with America against
Iraq. The common arguments against the Government regarding the Iraq war is that
they were not completely truthful regarding the reasons for getting envoloved
with this conflict even if the conflict was legal.
I believe there are other reasons for getting involved with the conflict that
the media seem to have overlooked.
Remeber that the mantra from the American government was that terrorism of any
kind would not be tolerated. Iraq financed and protected terrorists therefore
the conflict was justified was, at least one of the arguments.
Britain's main land has a bloody history because of terrorism. The Irish
Republican Army bombed Britain and killed British. They could not be stopped
regardless of the relatively mighty power of the British military forces.
Terrorists require a network of support. Terrorists will succeed if they can
commit their actions and then disappear quickly. To do that they need people who
are preared to help. In addition they need a steady stream of money in
order to purchase effective weapons to fight a government's military
forces. Americans supplied that network and much of that money, millions
of dollars.
Take a walk through Boston MA, near the Gillette factory. You will find IRA
murals painted on building walls. Anti-British graffiti written in letters that
were not written in a few minutes. These messages were clearly painted with the
cooperation of the authorities.
The country that Britain was about to go to war with was part of the IRA's
terrorist network and were responsible for financing the terrorists that
murdered thousands of Britain's citizens. Many of IRA's leaders enjoyed the
hospitality of the American Whitehouse.
The current New Labor British Government above all else, are, in my opinion:
very clever. They are what I call "Master Chess Players".
The American mantra "terrorism of any kind would not be tolerated" must have
immediately rung some bells. If Britain could shut down the IRA's
American-support network then and only then would the IRA-British peace talks
have a new urgent agenda.
The British government would, in my opinion have told the American government
that they would get the complete support of the British government if they could
promise to shut down the IRA's America support network.
Once the network had been choaked, if not completely shutdown the IRA would have
found themselves with a cash flow problem. Their organisation would have become
dependent on this financial input stream and would now have to find other ways
of financing their organisation.
The IRA have been blamed for the robbery of £26.5 million from the Northern Bank
in Belfast.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/4281547.stm
Tony Blair is credited with taking the Brits into war with America against
Iraq. The common arguments against the Government regarding the Iraq war is that
they were not completely truthful regarding the reasons for getting envoloved
with this conflict even if the conflict was legal.
I believe there are other reasons for getting involved with the conflict that
the media seem to have overlooked.
Remeber that the mantra from the American government was that terrorism of any
kind would not be tolerated. Iraq financed and protected terrorists therefore
the conflict was justified was, at least one of the arguments.
Britain's main land has a bloody history because of terrorism. The Irish
Republican Army bombed Britain and killed British. They could not be stopped
regardless of the relatively mighty power of the British military forces.
Terrorists require a network of support. Terrorists will succeed if they can
commit their actions and then disappear quickly. To do that they need people who
are preared to help. In addition they need a steady stream of money in
order to purchase effective weapons to fight a government's military
forces. Americans supplied that network and much of that money, millions
of dollars.
Take a walk through Boston MA, near the Gillette factory. You will find IRA
murals painted on building walls. Anti-British graffiti written in letters that
were not written in a few minutes. These messages were clearly painted with the
cooperation of the authorities.
The country that Britain was about to go to war with was part of the IRA's
terrorist network and were responsible for financing the terrorists that
murdered thousands of Britain's citizens. Many of IRA's leaders enjoyed the
hospitality of the American Whitehouse.
The current New Labor British Government above all else, are, in my opinion:
very clever. They are what I call "Master Chess Players".
The American mantra "terrorism of any kind would not be tolerated" must have
immediately rung some bells. If Britain could shut down the IRA's
American-support network then and only then would the IRA-British peace talks
have a new urgent agenda.
The British government would, in my opinion have told the American government
that they would get the complete support of the British government if they could
promise to shut down the IRA's America support network.
Once the network had been choaked, if not completely shutdown the IRA would have
found themselves with a cash flow problem. Their organisation would have become
dependent on this financial input stream and would now have to find other ways
of financing their organisation.
The IRA have been blamed for the robbery of £26.5 million from the Northern Bank
in Belfast.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/4281547.stm
