sorry, had to go to work.
As to Euthanasia being a crime, taking ppl off life support is done every day in nearly every state of the union. I guess "neglect" is not considered murder then, just like pitching a baby in a dumpster. Same thing in many ways.
And LOL at Divinci and Einstien. Leo primarily made his living designing military contraptions, and Albert?, uh, "Father of the Atomic Bomb". And why is it so much easier to become evil than good? How much effort does a smile take over say, loping the heads off new borns? Everyone notices when you kill screaming infants, but you do a good deed like donating food and clothing, taking payroll deductions to United way and caring for the elderly, you get ignored. BTW I'm a sucker for Girlscout cookies and Boy Scout raffles.
Certainly I am evil incarnate and do not deserve a future, I might invent something devistating like anti-gravity. If my mom had had an abortion then I wouldn't be posting here, pretty simple really. The choice wasn't just her's, she is a responsible individual who weighs the facts. If my fetal mass had been a danger to her exsistance then you can bet your sweet ass my embionic fluids would have been one with sewage. Problem here is ppl having abortions because pregnancy and the possibility of a child interfers with their life styles. I already stated my opinion on those miscreants.
As too Bush signing legislation. LOL. I'm glad that as head of the Federal Government he is actually taking a stand. But really, unless he gets an ammendment to the Bill of Rights, States can do as they will, at the sacrafice Federal funds (monitary arm twisting tactics). Example: Federal Speed Limit over turned by Wyoming, hence Wyoming does not recieve Federal Interstate funding. SInce there is no "National Health Care", Bush is an idiot looking for public support for what? Maybe the Republican party? Wait, could we be coming up on an election year? Uh yea.
And dOOds, arguing over what the woman feels, wants, needs, whatever. She has a voice and can assimilate her own opinions just as good as any man. On the same note, let us ask the fetus:
"Blob of protien, do you want to live?"
"..."
"Hey you moved, that must mean yes"
"..."
Pity, I'm sure you would get a stronger response from the millions of Dogs and Cats that are "put to sleep" (awe, that sounds so nice) each year. Extermination seems to be a logical response to that dilema, and so does sterilization. Hey, didn't some German guy provide free spay and neuter clinics and gas millions of "animals". Funny, when things are taken to extremes, even "partial" practices become ugly and abohorant. However totally disgusting things that are common place get wide acceptance. If abortions were like wiping your ass, noone would demand legislation for butt plugs. Stupid arguement yet demonstrates a point.
Problem with abortions 3 basic questions need to be answered: How, When and Why. If you ban abortions, the "where" moves out to more hazardous locals. How is the easy one, what ever is safest,and for the insurance companies, the least expensive. When? the moot point I take it. How about "when required or requested". That leaves Why. Why? because it has been granted or needs to be done. Abortion clinics break some of the rules governing the Why. Because the woman wants to becomes the only reason, her reasons. Why men want to influence that decision is acceptable, but controlling that decision, no, not acceptable. There are quandries even on every instance. Is the woman being rational? Is the woman being responsible or just selfish? If strigent screening processes were adopted (heh, adopted) and the mandated sterization for offenders enforced, maybe this wouldn't be such an issue. Oops, I forgot religion... Sh1tcan woman's rights back to the dark ages, and while you're at it science and medicine. Afterall the church is good, whoever heard of religeous groups killing anyone. Well, not fetuses anyways.