Obama whacks Osama...
- Thread starter Lizard Of Oz
- Start date
-
Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.
Our nation is supposed to be a beacon of human rights. Half of our arguments for running around being the world police is our own self-justification. It is all a big farce (which it is, really) if we will not even adhere to the accusations we thrust upon others.
I thought this was supposed to be a funny thread....not a political thread.
Next thing you know someone is gonna start talking religion, and then the forum will crash.
Next thing you know someone is gonna start talking religion, and then the forum will crash.
See, it starts off being a funny rhyming thread, and then it turns into "OMFG IM WRYGHT ABUT EVERFYFING EN PAWLITICKZ" a couple pages later, and "OMFG I HZ COMSPIRASEE TEORY"
P.S. I got on here to procrastinate.
Last edited:
I wanna put this to the test - so i apologise in advance if it works
1
2
3
GOD!
...
nope
its still up
War is not a reasonable tactic. Nuff said.
Now, enough with the morals in war and let's get back to the marmots!
Frankly, most of the time that's because they know we either won't do it or it will break our morale. Having a "minimum acceptable level" just makes it so that people who know what that level is can exploit you.
Festering Anus
Cheeto Hans
Geneva conventions are pretty solid, although there's a bit of stupid things in there. One, a bayonet cannot have a serrated edge. I'm sure the guy having a knife thrust through his abdomen has bigger concerns.
Terror Alert Update:
The English are feeling the pinch in relation to recent terrorist threats
and have therefore raised their security level from "Miffed" to "Peeved."
Soon, though, security levels may be raised yet again to "Irritated" or even
"A Bit Cross."
The English have not been "A Bit Cross" since the blitz in 1940 when tea
supplies nearly ran out.
Terrorists have been re-categorized from "Tiresome" to "A Bloody Nuisance."
The last time the British issued a "Bloody Nuisance" warning level was in
1588, when threatened by the Spanish Armada.
The Scots have raised their threat level from "Pissed Off" to "Let's get the
Bastards." They don't have any other levels. This is the reason they have
been used on the front line of the British army for the last 300 years.
The French government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror
alert level from "Run" to "Hide." The only two higher levels in France are
"Collaborate" and "Surrender." The rise was precipitated by a recent fire
that destroyed France 's white flag factory, effectively paralysing the
country's military capability.
Italy has increased the alert level from "Shout Loudly and Excitedly" to
"Elaborate Military Posturing." Two more levels remain: "Ineffective Combat
Operations" and "Change Sides."
The Germans have increased their alert state from "Disdainful Arrogance" to
"Dress in Uniform and Sing Marching Songs." They also have two higher
levels: "Invade a Neighbour" and "Lose."
Belgians, on the other hand, are all on holiday as usual; the only threat
they are worried about is NATO pulling out of Brussels.
The Spanish are all excited to see their new submarines ready to deploy.
These beautifully designed subs have glass bottom s so the new Spanish navy
can get a really good look at the old Spanish navy.
Australia, meanwhile, has raised its security level from "No worries" to
"She'll be alright, Mate." Two more escalation levels remain: "Crikey! I
think we'll need to cancel the barbie this weekend!" and "The barbie is
cancelled." So far no situation has ever warranted use of the
final escalation level.
John Cleese - British writer, actor and tall person
The English are feeling the pinch in relation to recent terrorist threats
and have therefore raised their security level from "Miffed" to "Peeved."
Soon, though, security levels may be raised yet again to "Irritated" or even
"A Bit Cross."
The English have not been "A Bit Cross" since the blitz in 1940 when tea
supplies nearly ran out.
Terrorists have been re-categorized from "Tiresome" to "A Bloody Nuisance."
The last time the British issued a "Bloody Nuisance" warning level was in
1588, when threatened by the Spanish Armada.
The Scots have raised their threat level from "Pissed Off" to "Let's get the
Bastards." They don't have any other levels. This is the reason they have
been used on the front line of the British army for the last 300 years.
The French government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror
alert level from "Run" to "Hide." The only two higher levels in France are
"Collaborate" and "Surrender." The rise was precipitated by a recent fire
that destroyed France 's white flag factory, effectively paralysing the
country's military capability.
Italy has increased the alert level from "Shout Loudly and Excitedly" to
"Elaborate Military Posturing." Two more levels remain: "Ineffective Combat
Operations" and "Change Sides."
The Germans have increased their alert state from "Disdainful Arrogance" to
"Dress in Uniform and Sing Marching Songs." They also have two higher
levels: "Invade a Neighbour" and "Lose."
Belgians, on the other hand, are all on holiday as usual; the only threat
they are worried about is NATO pulling out of Brussels.
The Spanish are all excited to see their new submarines ready to deploy.
These beautifully designed subs have glass bottom s so the new Spanish navy
can get a really good look at the old Spanish navy.
Australia, meanwhile, has raised its security level from "No worries" to
"She'll be alright, Mate." Two more escalation levels remain: "Crikey! I
think we'll need to cancel the barbie this weekend!" and "The barbie is
cancelled." So far no situation has ever warranted use of the
final escalation level.
John Cleese - British writer, actor and tall person
[M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIO8B6fpFSQ[/M]
She mentions at one sentence about a killer of Osama, this video is old, another proof he was dead already.
And there is other video, that I cannot find right now, which was a witness of the attack, saying basically that there was nobody inside and that he walked by the house everyday with his wife and that he doesn't believe that Usama was there. It all seems staged.
I DON'T BELIEVE YOU OBAMA, SHOW ME THE VIDEO/PIC PROOF, OR I CALL YOU A FRIGGIN LIAR!
She mentions at one sentence about a killer of Osama, this video is old, another proof he was dead already.
And there is other video, that I cannot find right now, which was a witness of the attack, saying basically that there was nobody inside and that he walked by the house everyday with his wife and that he doesn't believe that Usama was there. It all seems staged.
I DON'T BELIEVE YOU OBAMA, SHOW ME THE VIDEO/PIC PROOF, OR I CALL YOU A FRIGGIN LIAR!
I wonder if the same bunch of idealistic libs that have no problem with our cia agents being prosecuted would have a problem with the current administration being prosecuted for violating pakistan's sovereignty. I also wonder if eric holder, who previously defended gitmo detainees, has a conflict of interest (and that's being generous). or hell, would this same bunch defend what was clearly an assassination when they argued they should face criminal charges and have miranda rights
really, to hear the same crowd that advocates single payer and/or obamacare talk about our morals/traditions is laughable. yea, give terrorists constitutional rights and piss on our citizen's constitutional rights regarding our federal government.
really, to hear the same crowd that advocates single payer and/or obamacare talk about our morals/traditions is laughable. yea, give terrorists constitutional rights and piss on our citizen's constitutional rights regarding our federal government.
Fiction generally is.
Are you serious? Are you playing the same birther game for everything? How about this as making the most sense about the Bhutto video. I shouldn't expect you, of course, to possess the common sense to accept the most likely explanation, but oh well.
[M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IIn_UnLO9I&feature=player_embedded#at=218[/M]
~Jason