So what will be the disadvantage to using the M4A1......you will be pretty close to being a walking tank once armor introduced........plus you have a gernade launcher, lazer attachmnet (making it easier to hit in close combat than most weapons), a flashlight, and a scope. Sure you will be slowed down but with the current strafing system in place and the current moving speeds people will only need to strage 1 or 2 times and just fire a gernade to wipe anyone hoping stop the M4A1 user. And in close combat they will now full-auto, which is the only failing in the M16 currently in the game. On top of that, in close combat they will have a LAM to aim with, making it so they don't have the view restriction of the iron sights that others will have to contend with. The scope will make it so other guns with scopes will not be need (such as the SIG and G11, there are others too). This would not be so bad but anyone hiding will just be killed with a nade' where as a sniper with another weapon would have to either move or pray the enemy is stupid enough to rush you.
So where is the disadvantage here. Is it in the bulk? I don't think it will be a factor as this gun is a superior sniping weapon. Is it in the CQB? I don't think so there either as the user does not need other weapons (thus having a decent bulk) and has a full-auto gun with a LAM.
So please point out where theres a disadvantage.
So where is the disadvantage here. Is it in the bulk? I don't think it will be a factor as this gun is a superior sniping weapon. Is it in the CQB? I don't think so there either as the user does not need other weapons (thus having a decent bulk) and has a full-auto gun with a LAM.
So please point out where theres a disadvantage.