To HeresJohnny, my english is usually alot better. You can generally tell when I'm writing in haste or flipping between CNN.com and here, as I tend to lose myself in mid-sentence.
As for dissociative behaviour, I don't think I demonstrate it at all. That's like the old thing about all ****phobes being gay -- if you say you like gays, you're gay. If you say you don't like gay's, you're still gay. Use your fu cking head. It doesn't work like that. There's no lose/lose situation here. You'll also kindly note how I never attacked anybody personally until they attacked me. Did you happen to notice where people were bitching me out for newbie bashing, and I merely clarified the matter that I wasn't necessarily referring to newbies? I didn't go ballistic on them, did I? I suggest you do some research before opening your mouth and letting whatever inflamed, irrational thought plop out. This extends further into your attempt to categorize me. My internet tough guy makes threats about "real" life stuff that he can't have his ass cash. I haven't done that, have I? No. The righteous man is the last word/only word type. Ie: fascist. I haven't said any one person's opinion is better than mine, have I? No. I don't know what other round hole of a category you attempted to pound my square peg into, but I'm fairly sure its wrong too. I hope you can read book reports more objectively and more in-depth than you can peruse a 6 page text discussion on the internet, or I fear for the welfare of the students under your tutolage. You're not one of those ultra-politically correct teachers, are you? Cause you really sound like one. Political correctness... naziism for the new millennium. Anyways, I'm going off on a tangent here.
Sure, I cross the line of acceptability. But acceptability is relative, isn't it? What a bible-thumping Florida senior finds acceptable won't be what a 15-year old jaded teenager riding the tail-end of Gen X finds acceptable. I don't care what your level of acceptability is, because its not mine. And if I don't cross my own line of acceptability, then what have I done wrong? Offend somebody in a free country, where pleasing 100% of the populace is impossible?
Or is it unacceptable to have any view other than the pacifist's view, that same pacifist's view that kept the United States sitting out of World War II until Pearl Harbor got bombed, despite fascism spreading like a cancer on the world? Should I adopt that point of view and turn the other cheek? I don't turn cheeks, unless its to drop my pants and wag my ass in your face.
So I insult people directly in my posts when they insult me directly. Just because my insults are alot funnier and more effective than theres doesn't mean its not well justified. If some little guy comes up and punches me in the face, I will punch him back, despite the fact that my punch may be x amount more powerful.
If you have a problem with that, I suggest you pity yourself before trying to pity me
), his efforts are usually motivated (at least i think they are) with INF's best interest in mind. Keeping the game and it's community as good as it can be. I respect that and look forward to seeing posts by mojo everytime i check the forum -even if he were to attack me personally. I'd hate to be on that end of the barrel... but there's usually a good reason. anyway... 
