Lol. The truth is that Ayn never really talked all that much about here believes to the public. There is in fact very few quotes of hers that even exist that pertain to her true feelings of political philosophy. What we have here to day with Ayn is her prediction coming true and everyone going out and buying the books leading to her being a number one best seller after probably sixty years with Atlas Shrugged. That lead to the lefties raging war once against her once again. Leaving off exactly where they stopped their fight against here all those decades ago. What we have with Atlas Shrugged is a novel with a prediction intertwined in a story about where it all ends with productive leaving the unproductive to rot in their own filth. The book however is about the basic idea of give and take the basic idea of the value of money, of liberty, of freedom, regulation, over taxation, takers that push for equality, but practice laziness and control of others. It shines on this government in a negative light giving off the impression they control everything and their supporters, the takers, can't see reason for nothing(lol not false). It would show court cases where the business man was in front of the government and the business man would decree there was no reason for him to be there at all as he had no power to change their minds and his rights no longer existed. This ofcourse lead to the judge asking stupid questions and doing what the businessman said he would. (much like the congress today, btw (aka Toyota, GM, Chrysler, Banks and Banks that were forced to take loans, electronic companies, insurance companies, etc etc etc etc etc etc. Going to the congress isn't about having a chance is about dealing with tripe until they decide to dish out punishments or just decide to take you over, whichever one)
Anyway, yes I believe she was pure capitalist even if she never said it out right. However, claiming that is enough for why she is wrong is retarded. It wouldn't be enough if I said it about pure socialist and its not enough for a capitalist either.
Oh and the Hickman stuff is lol. Obama has far more issues with that kind of thing then Ayn, and he even appointed them to cabinet positions, but you guys aren't bitching about that...hmmm. Which is actually relevant to something when Hickman was not. I guess its kind like the fact that Obama was a horrible student, but all you guys care about is how Bush was a horrible student. Or how Obama got into Harvard by favors which just happens to be what bush did aswell with Yale, but low and behold its a big ****ing deal when bush did it, but somehow not Obama. Obama even gets credit for gaining access. Not sure with what though. He won't release his SAT scores, which if anything tells me they're embarrassing. On top of it, everyone thinks Obama is a great speaker, but the reality is when you take away is speech tutor he says like more times then a retarded teenager on crack. Though its hard to tell when he answers every question he doesn't want to answer in twenty five minutes or more. After the first five minutes most likely you are only half listening, afterall.
Yes Slayer, that point was totally worth bringing up and totally makes him look like a jackass. Can you be any dumber?
------
edit: and Ron Paul is moron that believes that ending federal currency is the right path to take. Saying that states should have their own currency and the fed should stay out of it. He like to support all of this by saying that that current currency is unconstitutional and that the fed can't be responsible for such a responsibility. Which ok, that last part is true, but we have tried his idea before and it just lead to all currency being worthless. Yes, the current system is doing the same thing in just a different way, however, I fail to see how replacing one failed idea with another is actually the right thing to do. It seems to me to be more like the retarded thing to do.