Dell has gone out of its way to prove to us that it is still exceedingly stupid and still controls a commanding share of the worlds MORON market.
Dude, don't get a Dell.
Intel recently said they believe the market is not ripe yet for 64 bit, but I believe they have to say such things. They have been caught with their pants down by AMD. AMD's Opteron processor is cheaper than Itanium and can run 32 bit and 64 bit applications under the same processor where Intel's Itanium 2 cost triple, and runs 32 bit application by way of a slow emulation, most likely as a response to the AMD 64 bit processor.
Does Dell truly believe that the world is not ready for a 64bit platform?
I went to Dell's web site to see if the company currently offers an Itanium based server and found that such a beast does exist inside the Dell confines. The Dell PowerEdge 3250, is a 2u, dual processor, Itanium based server that will run Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition or either Red Hat Linux workstation or advanced server.
Dell obviously sells 64 bit PowerEdge servers, so they do offer 64 bit ready-made workstations and servers now. Why not Opteron? According to Dell, The price is not right.
I decided to look at the unit price of the Itanium vs. the Opteron. According to Mid Range Server dot com, the unit price of the Intel Itanium -- in lots of 1,000 -- is $1,338 for the 1.3 GHz yield and is as much as $4,426 for 1.5 GHz yields, which also contain a hefty 6 MBs of L3 cache; also in lots of 1,000 units. The AMD Opteron 246 chip, featuring 64 bit will sell for $749 in lots of 1,000. IBM is selling servers with these processors which sport up to 12 GBs of memory. According to IBM, cheaper Opterons can deliver up to 80% of the speed of the Itanium at 25% of the cost.
Dude, don't get a Dell.