1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.

UTPure - keep it or kick it?

Discussion in 'Jailbreak General' started by Sexmachine, Aug 11, 2003.

?

UTPure - keep it or kick it?

  1. Keep it!

    57.1%
  2. Kick it!

    42.9%
  1. Sexmachine

    Sexmachine - retired -

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    1,429
    Likes Received:
    0
    As you know, the Jailbreak MotherShip makes use of the latest client side hack protection called UTPure. I really like to know what you think about this protection in general and if UTPure should stay or should be removed from the server.
     
  2. CoolDude

    CoolDude New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    0
    Keep it.
    Otherwise I'm never sure if others are really that good (which automatically means I'm not).
    :cool:
     
  3. Birelli

    Birelli meh...

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2001
    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think kick it, for a couple of reasons. First, as already debated in another thread, I don't think it would mean all that much reduced protection for the server. I somehow doubt we even need protection against this stuff, but it's always possible, however I think and older version will still be reasonably good at stopping "casual" cheaters.

    The second is a matter of gameplay, which is that UTPure is seriously screwing things up. With every new version of Pure (or so it seems), comes another slew of small, but cumulative, bugs. Several of these don't even seem to be Jailbreak-related. If and when a seriously bug-reduced version of Pure comes out, it might be worth the Jailbreak-related issues (if there even are any, I'm not even convinced all the bugs so far aren't solely Pure-induced) to put the newest version back on.

    On a totally different note, most aimbot use is with instagib and face-or-face-like-only servers. With the JB Mothership on normal weapons and with many maps that are very ill-suited for sniping, the vast majority of aimbotters would be little or no threat, in fact I've actually played instagib in EternalCaves against an aimbotter and not only beaten the guys team by a large margin, but had more frags then the aimbotter.

    In my view, people largely overrate the effectiveness of aimbots, largely because they haven't really played against people using aimbots, since they are fairly rare even on completely un-protected servers.
     
  4. Mychaeel

    Mychaeel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,830
    Likes Received:
    0
    Run UTPure 53, the last version that was tested and confirmed to run well with Jailbreak III. (And please don't give me that "It's no use to run an older version" nonsense.)
     
  5. Sexmachine

    Sexmachine - retired -

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    1,429
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nope, I'll give you this "nonsense" instead (copied from this thread):

    The MotherShip server is running the latest UTPG patch V451 and unfortunately just the last three versions of UTPure (6C,D or E) do support this patch. Downgrading to UTPure53 (and thus downgrading to UT V436) would open up a couple of security holes and offer cheaters a lot of possibilities that "could" take away the fun from playing at the Mo'ship.

    Hopefully the next UTPG patch is coming along with a working MD5 protection (as we may get rid of UTPure that way) ...


    So it's either keep up with the latest Pure or remove it completely.
     
  6. Foetal Youth

    Foetal Youth New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2001
    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    0
    Whats wrong with using CSHP?
     
  7. Mychaeel

    Mychaeel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,830
    Likes Received:
    0
    CSHP is even older than UTPure.

    I read that thread, Sexmachine, but to me it sounds as if those "security holes" that are "opened" by UTPure 53 are simply those that were closed by later versions; and not security holes that would not be in the patched server without any version of UTPure being run.

    Do I understand you correctly there?
     
  8. Trueblood

    Trueblood Silly Brit

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    842
    Likes Received:
    0
    Keep it!
    As Birelli said, the problems are minor. All thats needed is to change your setting Before play. If you think about it, changing setting during play is an excuse to camp and lagg everyone down (not by much i know) but things are fine!
     
  9. Sexmachine

    Sexmachine - retired -

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    1,429
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah Mych, if I understand you correctly you've understood me correctly - that's why I have summed it up by saying we can have:

    a.) NO Pure at all (but Patch 451 running to take care of the DOS prob)
    b.) Pure Version 6C,D or E (but no older ones, as they do NOT work with Patch 451 - same goes for CSHP+ afaik)
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2003
  10. Mychaeel

    Mychaeel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,830
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ah. So you cannot run UTPure 53 on a server patched to version 451. Previously, it sounded to me as if you didn't want to run UTPure 53 because you believed it would be futile.
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2003
  11. Sexmachine

    Sexmachine - retired -

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    1,429
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, that's my point here - I cannot run older Pures without going back to UT Patch 436 (and the 436 patch allows for a DOS attack and some sort of "forced client crash" by using a corrupt player skin).

    Downgrading to UTPure53 (just assuming this would work with the 451 patch) isn't futile, but would not defeat those hacks/bots/radars developed since August (?) 2002 - and if those dirt bags (the cheaters) do update just one single piece of their software it's those hacks/bots/radars. :(
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2003
  12. KrazyK

    KrazyK New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2001
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Since MapVote has a kick feature do we really need to worry about people cheating. Hopefully all of us will have guts to stand up and do what's right and kick the offending player.:mad: I also agree with Birelli that the Mothership doesn't run many maps that would attract aimbotters and the like. So I say: KICK IT!
     
  13. TheSpoonDog

    TheSpoonDog CBP3! Yarrr!

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2001
    Messages:
    2,592
    Likes Received:
    0
    Were the security holes in v436 that bad? (like, is v451 patch worth it?). v436 with UTPure 53 would at least make it harder for n00b aimbotters. If I had to choose for either of your two options, I would say kick it altogether (or downgrade to v436 and UT Pure 53, if that's an option)...
     
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2003
  14. ]yS[concrete

    ]yS[concrete New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    as far as ive heard the 451 patch was basically made to patch up that backdoor that the DDOS attacks exploited (altho it seems like they didnt happen until this patch was released... hmmmm...)

    alotta ppl seem to think it's just a HUGE step forward in hack protection but i dont THINK it is... but supposedly there's a really substantial update to PURE that's supposed to be released soon...

    also, there's so many kinds of bots... geezus... but i mean you also gotta think... if someone is completely 100% waaaaay too obviously botting, everyone can kick em or an admin can ban if theyre around... and if it's not obvious then it's probably not really disrupting gameplay all that much anyway right?
     
  15. Wormbo

    Wormbo Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2001
    Messages:
    5,913
    Likes Received:
    36
    Epic concidered them bad enough to not advertise pre-2199 UT2003 servers through the master server anymore which have the same issues.
    I'd say kick UTPure. That might even open up the server for more mods and mutators that wouldn't work with UTPure.
     
  16. Sexmachine

    Sexmachine - retired -

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    1,429
    Likes Received:
    0
    The MapVote kick feature is pretty useless as players can only kick people and not kickban them, so cheaters can easily spoil the game as they are able to come back all of the time. You need an admin around to really take care of them.
    The downside of this is the fact that -without Pure- players tend to think that e.g. "PlayerX is way too good so he must be cheating" ... don't understimate the power of humanoid paranoia. :)
    I completely disagree in that point. There are so many different hacks available (not just aimbots) so cheaters can have the right one for the right situation on just about every map - aimbots and other weapon hacks for the '100% kills', a radar to know where the enemies are, or even a wallhack to see (and shoot?) through solids.
    Yepp, that's why downgrading to UT V436 is not an option.
    By now I (we) have always managed to get the mutators to work on the Mo'ship along with UTPure ... if we come to the point where we can't get a mutator to work because of UTPure, I am the first to take UTPure down (at least temporarily).

    Very interesting thread so far (and it's 50/50 atm.) ... any more opinions?
     
  17. TheSpoonDog

    TheSpoonDog CBP3! Yarrr!

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2001
    Messages:
    2,592
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well... on the other hand now that I think about it... are the problems that bad? The enforcer invisible, and the occasional screen stuck in the death sequence (which I found was able to be fixed in some cases by switching views to a teammate and back)... maybe it's better to just keep the latest UTPure on. I've never experienced an aimbotter, nor have I ever seen one being used... I haven't even seen what they are! :p So I don't really have much idea about the size of the problem - cheating is pathetic and ruins the game because games are all about testing your skill against yourself I thought, not how big of a score you can get :rolleyes: . But back on topic...

    Is it possible to mention to the authors of UTPure about these problems and perhaps they could add some fix for the next release?
     
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2003
  18. Sexmachine

    Sexmachine - retired -

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    1,429
    Likes Received:
    0
    I already did that, but for some unknown reasons the authors of UTPure do not care that much about gametypes other than the standard UT ones :(
     
  19. Katana

    Katana Shock Whore!

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Kick it. i got kicked from the mo' ship 5 times cos it found an "Impurity" in my client, WTF.
    I dunno if it was just that annoying alcatraz map having a hissy fit or something but it completely ruined my JB playing on Monday.
     
  20. Sexmachine

    Sexmachine - retired -

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Messages:
    1,429
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is a 99,9% chance of fixing that one, as a very common reason for that is you may have UTPure (doesn't make a difference what version) installed on your PC. If thats the case, delete all files that somehow belong to UTPure. You'll find them in your UT\System directory - look out for (and delete) files like:
    • UTPureRCXX.u
    • BP1HandlerXX.u
    • BP4HandlerXX.u
    If that does not help, clear your UT\Cache folder too.
     

Share This Page