Unreal Tournament 2007 Media

[slime73]

I think Epic said that they would be putting the nades back in the RL, so it could be nades.

 

[Kenshin333]

Dont you think these rockets on this link:
http://media.pc.ign.com/media/746/746632/img_3576827.html
look a bit weird? Oo
They are pretty flat...

 

[IllusionS]

does anyone else think the rockets look gay?

The vehicles look cool, as well as the hoverboards, but i really dont care about them...im still questioning the actual gameplay effect of hoverboards...we'll see though

 

[Selerox]

Give it to me!

We definitely want to be the premiere Deathmatch and CTF game on the market for both platforms.

Yes! Yes! Oh god YES!!!

 

[BadAss84]

Yes! Yes! Oh god YES!!!

 

[Nemephosis]

All it looks like is UT2004 with more polygons. Hardly worth upgrading my computer for. They had this huge gametype, and then turned it into Onslaught the Second. They're bringing back Face, Deck, Torlan, and apparently now most of the vehicles. Where's the incentive?

 

[Fuzzle]

New movement model, onslaught revamp, and 9 new vehicles are my main incentive.

 

[DeathBooger]

All it looks like is UT2004 with more polygons. Hardly worth upgrading my computer for. They had this huge gametype, and then turned it into Onslaught the Second. They're bringing back Face, Deck, Torlan, and apparently now most of the vehicles. Where's the incentive?

Um, they were always bringing back the vehicles in UT2004. The incentive is new gameplay, it's pretty obvious.

 

[SirYawnalot]

Not to mention the extra polygons!

 

[IllusionS]

it's not just the polygons, it's the lighting and normal mapping, UT has never even had bump mapping...now it will have normal mapping and HDR lighting, even if it does suck..it still looks awesome.

 

[Nemephosis]

Um, they were always bringing back the vehicles in UT2004. The incentive is new gameplay, it's pretty obvious.

What new gameplay? It's the same DM, CTF etc. etc. we've had since 1999 now. Even Onslaught is just Onslaught on bigger maps.

 

[DeathBooger]

What new gameplay? It's the same DM, CTF etc. etc. we've had since 1999 now. Even Onslaught is just Onslaught on bigger maps.

Okay.

 

[Mr moogle]

Blasphemy!

 

[Nemephosis]

Yes, great first post. You are destined to be a shining beacon of glorious light on this forum, indeed.

 

[Kantham]

Lmao nem, you really love those new registered users.

 

[klasnic]

Paladin's hot hot hot!

Cicada's not not not!

Levi's nice!

I hope the necris don't exclusively get the cool vehakalz but I'm smiling

 

[Fuzzle]

Why don't people like the new cic? I think it's way sweet.

 

[hal]

Nem, who's to say it won't play different? It should be a combination of UT2004 and UT, and Epic has never failed to add new stuff. New maps, new engine, new sound, new whatever. That's why you buy a sequel to a game that you like.

 

[TraCK]

I like all the new vehakalz except the walker thing. Boo. And the cicada is too hawthawthawt!

 

[Caravaggio]

Do love me some gibs.
Looking at these more I'm kind of glad there were mistakes with ut2003, and some with 4, now they have a clearer idea of what works through trial and error. At least with gameplay, some of the gametypes seem a little too homogenized still.

And I know it won't happen, but if you can kill people with the legs of the walker and collect impaled bodies on them as you stomp around the map, I'll probably give up human companionship altogether.

It also doesn't bother me if there's even an iota of truth to worries about gloss over gameplay, even that will just serve to attract that many more mod makers.

What new gameplay? It's the same DM, CTF etc. etc. we've had since 1999 now. Even Onslaught is just Onslaught on bigger maps.

Well why stop at ut99, why aren't you still playing quake? It had ctf and dm and a lot of the same weapons. I mean, the million more polys we have here won't change things... ...right?