Things that make no sense in porn

  • Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.

Fuzz

Enigma
Jan 19, 2008
1,120
0
0
Universe
I spell it that way, pon, all semantics. Cute, isn't it?

I have to be more specific. Do boys use something, like a bunny, the erotic toy, to stimulate their g-spot like girls do? Their sensitive gland is much larger than the one girls have by the way. Remember your biology lessons?
 

SleepyHe4d

fap fap fap
Jan 20, 2008
4,152
0
0
I spell it that way, pon, all semantics. Cute, isn't it?

I have to be more specific. Do boys use something, like a bunny, the erotic toy, to stimulate their g-spot like girls do? Their sensitive gland is much larger than the one girls have by the way. Remember your biology lessons?

Whatever lotion I have laying around. Can we have vids detailing how you do it?
 

BobTheBeheader

New Member
Aug 31, 2005
799
0
0
36
Warshington State
I have a question: Is this thread derailed or not? It seems to be carefully hanging in between "on topic" and "massively derailed"

"Things that make no sense in porn" and "The nature of human sexuality and relationships"
 

Fuzz

Enigma
Jan 19, 2008
1,120
0
0
Universe
Someone should start a companion thread to this one and call it something like... never mind.

None wants to be awkward enough to start a thread like this on their own so they all come here instead with anything that comes to mind.

I consider Angelmapper to be a female too, so you're absolutely wrong to think that you can't find even a single woman online.

Gently press the bunny on your tummy until you feel the sensation. If you dare you can let it split you like a bamboo too, probably a faster way to reach orgasms. You don't even have to "squirt" to get them.

Let me guess, most people stay off ponography that doesn't make sense.
 

Fuzz

Enigma
Jan 19, 2008
1,120
0
0
Universe
It's not the squirt itself that is the orgasm, it's more of an emotional state that brings the entire body into play. You think orgasm and there you go, no physical evidence required. Of course squirting is all right too if not even more intense, but it's not the creme that counts it's the sensation, isn't it?
 

BobTheBeheader

New Member
Aug 31, 2005
799
0
0
36
Warshington State
Gently press the bunny on your tummy until you feel the sensation. If you dare you can let it split you like a bamboo too, probably a faster way to reach orgasms. You don't even have to "squirt" to get them.
:lol:
It's not the squirt itself that is the orgasm, it's more of an emotional state that brings the entire body into play. You think orgasm and there you go, no physical evidence required. Of course squirting is all right too if not even more intense, but it's not the creme that counts it's the sensation, isn't it?
I don't mind squirting, but I certainly dont think it's necessary. I think the appeal is that it's another way (besides moaning more loudly then before) for the woman to express that she's having an orgasm. Since you aren't actually their at the scene of the crime, that's all you've got to go on.
 

BobTheBeheader

New Member
Aug 31, 2005
799
0
0
36
Warshington State
So I had posted a pic of some tentacles in here, but NeoNite thought it was indecent and gave me an infraction for 0 points even though I censored it quite nicely.

So I wrote him back with a review of the picture:

You've got to admit, it's an incredibly well drawn piece of work, and also very unique. The artists (I forget who) is very talented at putting expressions on people's faces. The wides eyes with their dazed and helpless look, the open mouth, gasping, with the tongue sticking out... Alot of artwork is more centered around what the beast is doing to the girl, but in this, the focus is placed much more on what the girl is thinking and feeling.

The entire piece seems to come alive before one's eyes. For example, The use of the slime trails gives the entire picture a sense of motion and action. Even simple features like the bend in the girl's body near her torso create a friction that implies movement and activity.

The artist has given the impression that the beast is quite large, far larger then the few tenticles that are actually interacting with the girl. With the larger portion of the monster (especially the teeth) being in the background, the drawing becomes very suspenseful, and it's hard not to wonder what is going to happen to Asuka in the next few seconds.

I think one can classify drawings such as these by how much various regions of the subject's body are being hidden from the camera by tentacles. In most works I've seen, a common device is to nearly completely cover the subject's arms and legs with tentacles, so as to reinforce the idea that they are restrained. In my personal opinion, it has come to the point where this device is so commonly used it's just a gimmick. In this picture, the artist has left the vast majority of the girl's body exposed, and only the sexually "charged" regions are involved with the tentacles themselves. It helps put the audiance in more personal touch with the girl, to see more of her in the picture.

By the numbers, there aren't as many physical "tentacle" appendages wrapped around the girl as there are in alot of other drawings, but the artist still manages to convey the feeling that the girl is being "engulfed" by the beast. The penetration of the ear (which I don't personally care for) contributes to this as well. It's remarkable how this is accomplished while still revealing so much of the girl's body. Most images in this genere that I've seen directly depict the tenticular penetration of the genetailia, but in this instance, the artist has only mearly implied it (you can't see very much of the naughty bits in the uncensored version). The polar opposite to this would be not just penetration of the girl's vagina by the tentacles, but using the tentacles as a means of exposing the vagina to the camera.

Also, I've seen a lot of artists put a tentacle in the girl's mouth as well. In this instance, that has been omitted, and the artist has instead decided to have her mouth left open and gasping, reinforcing the viewers knowledge of what the girls is going through in a much more personal sense.

Please, this image is, from an artistic perspective, quite unique, and it's always best to look at what makes something good (for whatever it's worth) before disregarding it as trash.
 

Jacks:Revenge

╠╣E╚╚O
Jun 18, 2006
10,065
218
63
somewhere; sometime?
Wow, yeah, because when I saw the barely censored picture of the fake girl being raped I immediately thought about what must be going on in her mind and what her emotions are.
I'm sure that's what the artist wanted to elicit, you know, an emotional response to try and have us connect with the poor girl. Very deep stuff here, you're right. I certainly could pick out the element of movement what with the all the slime and juices.
I think you're spot on, we should be critically analyzing these highly unique and stunning pieces of art work rather than blowing them off like some sort of cheap, mass produced and highly specific pornographic material for those who just have to get their rocks off from the idea that a girl is being alien-raped.

And now, here's the naked cowboy in Times Square
tmsq0312b.jpg
 

Enfluence

I kinda like UT3.
Jan 25, 2008
214
0
0
What i don't get is why people think Gianna michaels is sexy...that makes no sense to me.