Official BeyondUnreal Photography Thread

  • Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.

IronMonkey

Moi?
Apr 23, 2005
1,746
0
36
63
Scotland
www.margrave.myzen.co.uk
A small experiment

ufraw allows denoise settings from 0-1000. I thought I'd try and see what the effect was of different denoise settings. These are from the raw image of the first photo (the one with the horses).

To my mind, it's very much a question of taste rather than a clear right or wrong. I suspect if I intended to print these in a large format, I'd probably go with more noise reduction rather than my current preference of no extra noise reduction.
 

Attachments

  • 0000nr.jpg
    0000nr.jpg
    39.1 KB · Views: 11
  • 0032nr.jpg
    0032nr.jpg
    22.6 KB · Views: 10
  • 0064nr.jpg
    0064nr.jpg
    23.9 KB · Views: 9
  • 0128nr.jpg
    0128nr.jpg
    20 KB · Views: 8
  • 0256nr.jpg
    0256nr.jpg
    13.6 KB · Views: 11

Rambowjo

Das Protoss
Aug 3, 2005
5,073
5
38
33
Tapeland
Is that really with an ISO speed of 50? I couldn't see it from the EXIF data, but it looked like maybe 400 or 800 iso.

Old cameras are not so good I guess :p
 

IronMonkey

Moi?
Apr 23, 2005
1,746
0
36
63
Scotland
www.margrave.myzen.co.uk
Is that really with an ISO speed of 50? I couldn't see it from the EXIF data, but it looked like maybe 400 or 800 iso.

Old cameras are not so good I guess :p
ISO 400 (max on a G3). The base image was a large banner (in case you are trying to work out what the surface texture should be).

The G3 is fine for what it is. It still outperforms most cheap compacts (despite a much lower mega-pixel count) - better focus, better lens and (this might surprise you) better noise performance.
 

Attachments

  • iso400.jpg
    iso400.jpg
    93.8 KB · Views: 13

das_ben

Concerned.
Feb 11, 2000
5,878
0
0
Teutonia
Some photos of the long distance hiking-trip I attended Friday and yesterday. I only took pictures in the first hours after the start, afterwards night fell and the next morning the only thing that I mentally connected with my camera was its weight - after thirteen and a half hours and 70km I had to give up. :/

[SCREENSHOT]http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4016/4654055158_3600f9be47_b.jpg[/SCREENSHOT]

[SCREENSHOT]http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4012/4653436087_54dc1c0c15_b.jpg[/SCREENSHOT]

[SCREENSHOT]http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4042/4654050646_e9c817bcfa_b.jpg[/SCREENSHOT]
 

Rambowjo

Das Protoss
Aug 3, 2005
5,073
5
38
33
Tapeland
Great pictures, though I think wideframe format is better when you're taking pictures of landscapes. That last one would've been amazing with more sky and horizon I think :)
 
Last edited:

Israphel

Sim senhor, efeitos especial
Sep 26, 2004
1,136
0
0
53
Lisboa,Portugal
Thanks for the comments guys, glad you liked the shots.

Israphel: It sounds like your making good money off of your work and rightfully, from the look of things. You have outstanding landscape photos. I am curious as to how you make money off of landscape photos. I ask not because of pure curiosity but because your business model has to be very different from mine in order to become profitable.

Where do you get/find your clients?
What do they normally ask of you?
What do they use the photos for?
All expenses payed?
What is the most profitable way of distributing your work?

If your not comfortable answering here you can PM me :)

Hey Mike
To be honest, making money out of landscape photography is bloody hard and kind of requires that you put yourself forward quite a bit for very little return. It is far easier to get well paid work as a wedding photographer (at least it is in Portugal, where I live).

In my experience, the most profitable way is to get your work out locally, and sell prints. I've got my work in various local galleries and cafes, and I'll sell a number of prints each month through these. You need to get used to taking knock backs, because most places (certainly galleries) will say "no thanks", but a couple will say yes, and that's how it starts. I have a portfolio of around 15 of my best shots printed out at 50-60cm and mounted, and these are what I take around to places. I leave business cards in every cafe and restaurant I visit, and occasionally get calls from places looking to put stuff on the walls. With galleries, they'll often add you to a waiting list (which can be years long)
Generally, the things which sell best are local shots. People seem to like to buy stuff of places they know.

Also, one thing that's really effective is calendars. I do one every year http://www.andymumford.com/calendar.html and give the proceeds to charity. I sell them around local companies (and give some to older clients) and these in turn can generate print sales in the future.

I've done a couple of local exhibitions as well. These can be profitable, but really require a large investment in time as well as a considerable outlay of cash in the first place, because you need to have 20-30 (depending on the size of the venue) images printed up quite large and really beautifully mounted. Of course if you don't sell them, then you'll lose money, so it helps to have a general idea of which of your shots people are likely to buy.
I've also noticed that people often like to buy things from exhibitions even if they don't want a print for their wall, so postcards and small books (the kind that Apple/Lulu/Blurb make) tend to sell quite well.

For me though, it's impossible to make a living doing this.

Other things i've done with landscape photography. Well, online prints sales are a waste of time. Just to put it into perspective, my front page at Deviant Art has had almost 200 000 hits, and my images somewhere between half and three quarters of a million hits....and yet the profit I've made on image sales there would just about cover the cost of a good tripod and ball head. It does get your name out I guess, and from DA I've been contacted a couple of times for CD covers and stock sales...but again, this still comes out less than the profit from shooting a couple of weddings.

Magazines. Most either no longer pay to use images, or pay very little because they know that don't need to. There are literally thousands of very talented people with dSLRs who are willng to let magazines use their images on the cover for free, simply because it feels great to have your image up there. Of course the big names like National Geographic and Outdoor Photographer still pay, but they tend to use the elite guys. I'm talking about the raft of DSLR User, Practical Photographer etc magazines that have sprung up over the last few years. The last magazine I was published in did a nine page spread and interview...and of course they didn't pay because (as you get bored of hearing) "it's good coverage for you" ie, they're doing you a favour.
I understand this, understand why it's like this, but ultimately, sending images off to magazines is time consuming and you receive very little benefit (apart from the buzz of seeing your images in print) from the time you spend...so I don't bother sending them off anymore.
Magazines still will pay for articles with images, and I've sold a few "how to" articles to Portuguese magazines (usually based on stuff that I've already written for ND Magazine but they don't pay very much.

Stock sales? Well, because of places like istock, Shutterstock etc, the price of stock images is pretty low now. Again, it's a large investment in time (in terms of keywording and submitting large quantities of images) for quite a small return. I occasionally get emails from people asking to use my images as stock via either my website or Deviant Art, and I prefer to do it myself rather than use an agency. CD or book covers pay quite well (the companies producing them usually have relatively generous budgets), whereas clients who want shots for spots on websites or web ads generally don't want to pay much (but often ask for 10 or more images).

So, basically making money from landscape photography really requires a lot of work for a pretty limited return. The most profitable way of spending time I've found, as I've said, is getting your prints out locally to as many places as possible. Even places like the dentist and doctors are places worth speaking to the office manager and leaving a card.

At the end of the day though, weddings are far more profitable. I'm lucky here in that Portugal is a lot less sophisticated than the US for wedding photography. For years here (and it's still the most common type of wedding shoot even now) people would pay for some guy in a cheap suit to turn up and shoot poses of every combination of the bride and grooms family possible, then make money by selling the prints.
Documentary style wedding photography is still rare here, and there is a niché for people who actually don't like posing (I can understand this, both me and my wife hate posing and at our wedding I gave my camera to a friend who's a part time photographer and asked him to shoot whatever he liked). For good wedding photography here, you pay and arm and a leg, so I've kind of aimed at a niche of affordable documentary style photography. I'm not comfortable directing people in poses, and I marvel at your ability to work with models, but i've never come at photography from that angle, so it feels strange for me.

When it comes to getting clients, well I advertise on a Portuguese wedding site, and I also work with a wedding planning agency (they have 3 photographers on their books, and clients choose which they prefer).
Most of my work comes via a good friend of mine who is a violinist, and organizes string quartets for weddings. She's one of the few people in Portugal who does this, and she throws a lot of work my way (and in return she gets all her publicity photography done free)

That's about it really, I hope I've answered some of your questions.

At the moment my wife and I are involved in a sustainable tourism project in southern Portugal, and when that's up and running I'm thinking of looking into doing photography weekends with courses for beginners and stuff...but that's a long way in the future.

All the best with everything.

Andy
 

Rambowjo

Das Protoss
Aug 3, 2005
5,073
5
38
33
Tapeland
That's a lot of great information right there. I wouldn't be surprised if the market is a lot different from country to country, but it still gives a basic idea of what is good and what is not to good, I guess.

Thanks :)
 

BillyBadAss

Strong Cock of The North
May 25, 1999
8,880
61
48
49
Tokyo, JP
flickr.com
Nice girl and 'old skool' because she's having an analogue camera. :dutch:

Thanks man. Actually this was shot with a totally mechanical analogue camera as well. My friends and I really like them. :)

Also:

The Long Kiss Goodnight


4654787704_fef6c206c4_z.jpg
 

Bi()ha2arD

Toxic!
Jun 29, 2009
2,808
0
0
Germany
phobos.qml.net
To pick up the raw processing topic again, what would you guys suggest for canon cr2?
I used to use Digital Photo Professional which came with my camera. However lately I used UFRaw on my laptop and it seems to be quite a bit more powerful than the bunch of sliders that DPP is.
Should I keep using UFRaw or go for Photoshop/Lightroom/Whatever?
 

Rambowjo

Das Protoss
Aug 3, 2005
5,073
5
38
33
Tapeland
I haven't tried anything else but Photoshop CS4 and CS5, but CS5 definitely seems to produce the best result of the two, and it gives a few more options.
 

IronMonkey

Moi?
Apr 23, 2005
1,746
0
36
63
Scotland
www.margrave.myzen.co.uk
To pick up the raw processing topic again, what would you guys suggest for canon cr2?
I used to use Digital Photo Professional which came with my camera. However lately I used UFRaw on my laptop and it seems to be quite a bit more powerful than the bunch of sliders that DPP is.
Should I keep using UFRaw or go for Photoshop/Lightroom/Whatever?
Why don't you stick with UFRaw until you have exhausted its possibilities? UFRaw has a myriad of options. Learn them.

And it's free...

Reasons you might consider the latest Photoshop:


  • You take a lot of low light/fast ISO photographs. Reports earlier in this thread sing the praises of the latest noise reduction capabilities.
  • You are into high volume photography. Although workflow is often a matter of taste, users of PS generally speak very highly of its capabilities in that respect.
  • You have recently received a large inheritance. :)
Personally, I'd go with the line that until I understood all that UFRaw could offer me (still some way to go here) I'd put off the expense of PS. Once I'd outgrown UFRaw then I would look to see if PS offered more (other than better noise reduction, I don't know if it does)
 

IronMonkey

Moi?
Apr 23, 2005
1,746
0
36
63
Scotland
www.margrave.myzen.co.uk
Interesting article here - 8 of the best photo managers for Linux: http://www.techradar.com/news/softw...est-photo-managers-for-linux-692441?artc_pg=1

I know most of you don't use Linux but I'm posting the details because the majority of the packages are available for OSX and MS Windows and the commentary regarding features is useful.


  • Fotoxx: http://kornelix.squarespace.com/fotoxx/ Linux-only. "Great for experimenting". Seems to be powerful but incomplete.
  • Picasa: http://picasa.google.com Available for Linux/OSX/MS Windows. I'm sure most of you know this one. Be careful installing it on Linux as it installs a parallel installation Wine which has been know to upset other bits of the system.
  • Bibble Pro: http://bibblelabs.com/ Available for Linux/OSX/MS Windows. Not cheap but looks very powerful.
  • RAWStudio http://rawstudio.org/ Available for Linux/OSX. Fairly focussed (sorry!) on the task of converting RAW images. Good batch facilities but will need to be used with another application for edit/presentation.
  • F-Spot: http://f-spot.org/Main_Page (NB incorrect link in the article). Linux-only. Seems to be a good allrounder but probably not for the advanced user. Tainted with Mono... :(
  • RawTherapee: http://www.rawtherapee.com/ Linux/Windows. This could be one to watch. "suited to workflow management for high-quality DSLRs". The latest version is still an alpha version but looks very interesting.
  • digiKam: http://www.digikam.org/ Linux-only (there might be a port somewhere or sometime to Windows but since Kate (KDE text editor) has only recently become stable on Windows, I wouldn't hold my breath). Very powerful and comprehensive application. Much better than some of the other contenders at photo management it still has fairly comprehensive editing capabilities. There is one thing that I know it can't do. I recently pointed it at an external USB drive with ~135 000 photos (~290GB) on it. 8GB of RAM and 10GB of swap later, it give up, taking my KDE session with it. Curiously, importing the drive contents as two separate directories (still pretty chunky, 220GB & 70GB) was no problem.
  • KPhotoAlbum: http://www.kphotoalbum.org/ Linux-only. OK but probably too basic for the readers of this thread.

Others worth considering:


  • Shotwell: http://www.yorba.org/shotwell/ Included in Fedora 13 as an alternative to F-Spot. Very similar in capabilities. It is available for Linux and (in a somewhat alpha state) MS Windows.
  • BlueMarine http://bluemarine.tidalwave.it/ Aims to be an all in one application. Available for Linux/OSX/Windows. Looking at the web site there is an air of "work in progress".
Apologies if I've missed your favourite application - just lacked the time to go tracking down everything. :(
 

Bi()ha2arD

Toxic!
Jun 29, 2009
2,808
0
0
Germany
phobos.qml.net
Thanks for the huge list, I'll look into it. I used F-Spot to get my picturs off my camera, but I found the app to be very confusing. I couldn't find any real settings to adjust it to my likings. On Windows I use Xnview to browse my pictures (which also has a linux version), only it has little editing options. It's nice for batch converting and stuff like that tho.
 

Rambowjo

Das Protoss
Aug 3, 2005
5,073
5
38
33
Tapeland
That's a great picture Biohazard. Where do you live exactly? I've seen a lot of pictures from you now involving weird abandoned stuff in the woods.

wood.png


Some wooden stick wall thing my mom is building outside.
 

BillyBadAss

Strong Cock of The North
May 25, 1999
8,880
61
48
49
Tokyo, JP
flickr.com
How do you go about scanning them? Or can they be developed to digital directly?

I personally scan the prints, but I am looking into getting a negative scanner which is the best way to to it. You can ask them to put the images on a CD for you at most places that develop film, but almost all of them will only do a 300dpi scan and save them as tif.

New photo:

Midday In A Perfect World


4662043626_9a37f14838_z.jpg