new Idea for Nc

[Symbolikal]

A author score from the the average of their map ratings. It would help stop these dumbf*cks who submit maps that where never changed and were probably morbias or summat. The author comment would be summat like "myscha stole the idea of morbias from me." Getting back, the people at the top would be more looked up to and some mappers that aren't so well known would make it and there would be a mapper award for every year, or other period of time. Get my Idea?

 

[Nahand]

...no...

 

[Symbolikal]

there is no flaw in there. It would help new mappers get potential.

 

[MassChAoS]

The flaw is I don't have a clue what you're talking about.

 

[Hourences]

I think he wants us to give the commenters points on their behaviour and then make a top 20 list of the best and most honest fair whatever commenter
problem is, who is going to rate the comments ? Not I or Mass.. it would prolly take too much
And letting the people vote on eachother is going to result in a complete mess prolly

 

[Symbolikal]

no, it is a mapper skill rating based on user and review scores on a mapper's maps.
That simple enough?
Mapraider do that but they have 2 million moderators (well you know where I'm coming from)

 

[Nahand]

... mapper's prestige points eh? I don't know, might get redundant because people already judge authors by their work (some exagerate, true)...

 

[ReD_Fist]

All I know is people be dishing out zeros,without trying the map,and or are able to place a score just from the screenshot.

There should be a way to correct that.

I posted this before,but i'll try again !!!

You know,a better solution might to be a multiple choice

A. junk heap (no playablity,bad graphics,bad bot paths)
B. Getting there (graphics getting there,bad playback,bad bot pathing)
C. Worth a try (looks good,plays good,bots are still lame)
D. Let er rip (looks good,Awsome gameplay!,bots clean house,slow FPS)
E. Ok lets play (really good graphics,can't wait to play,bots rule,fast fps)

F can't commit (wich blocks them from a comment or score)
take all the choices from all the commenters and then derive a number or somthing

Or some kind of combination to ware a person like me who does not like this cbp map at all,won't get flamed,being that they all cant say junk heap ,because everyone will not agree with wich the statement line in the selction.(pre formed opinion dictated by the one you get to pick from)
There will be some that likes the way it looks,but not just post a zero etc etc
or they may think it looks great but playback sucks.

Each map has it's merits ,and I know you ALL agree with that,so mabye this would work.

Another words,if the one you pick,has A; "bad online,playing,looks good"
the guy can't go on a rant about how it looks bad,just because he hates how i posted on another map .Thats not even his !!,then they can duel it out under the given maps name,not go post zeros on the commenters maps.

After all it seems to me most zero posting here is just nonsense,or revenge or the commentor is so flamming stupid he really shoudn't be commenting etc etc.

The critera for a map is
Looks;
No flaws,(bsp holes etc etc);
fast FPS;
bots clean house and don't get stuck;
fun factor;

another words a perfect map should ,look awsome,bots don't get stuck,fast FPS ,no BSP holes, and is fun.

 

[[DF]phalanx]

yea
kinda retarded IMO