<i>If someone walks up to my friend and kicks him in the balls without provocation, you can bet your ass I'll knock his teeth out. Unless you'd rather I just stand by while innocent people are maliciously attacked?</i>
So then why are you defending him? You saw how he proverbially kicked me in the balls by calling me a fool and giving me the thumbs down just cause his anime buddy "did some better ones" (that he promised to find but never did.) So where the fu<i></i>ck is your support for me, buddy?
<i>Besides, you're taking what I said out of context (as usual).</i>
Hardly, as you will see.
<i>I said, and I quote, "I find Mojo's existence offensive and insulting, yet you don't see me maliciously attacking him at every available opprotunity. I think Mojo needs some anger managment courses.", which was in direct response to your statement, "No, I'm lashing out because you're stupid and your whole existence offends me." I was indicating that, despite the fact that I find you offensive, I can refrain from personally attacking you at every available opprotunity.</i>
Yes, however here you attempt to make it appear as though I directed that against you, when in fact it was directed at phatcat, whereby you stepped in, and, despite your pledge to defend somebody who was attacked without provocation (as I have proved, that party was <i>me</i>) you decided to jump on me and take PhatCat's side.
<i>However, if you want to pick a fight with me, go right ahead. You'll find that I'm not as easy as phatcat.</i>
Hardly. You picked the fight with me. I chose to ignore it for a while because I am mature enough that I can disagree with friends when they are being stupid and side with enemies when they have a point. You, however, like to pick and choose based on your perceptions of reality rather than what is indeed fact.
Oh, and by the way, thanks to the help of caching, I noticed that you editted your original post... it originally said:
<i>"No, I'm lashing out because you're stupid and your [phatcat's] whole existence offends me."</i>
Which proves you deliberately removed the [phatcat's] part in an effort to make it look like the quote was directed against you, and you editted in time so that few, if any people (but me) saw it and you didn't have to get the "last editted by" portion. Again, proof that you, uninstigated, entered an arguement instigated by PhatCat to attack me.