1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.

Graphics

Discussion in 'Unreal Tournament 3' started by GreatEmerald, Apr 11, 2009.

  1. GreatEmerald

    GreatEmerald Khnumhotep

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    1
    I've noticed an interesting thing while I was at school in an IT class. Look at this picture. Especially works on those who don't know UT3. What do you see? Is it a scene from a movie? A video game? Or real life? I'm quite sure not everybody could answer that correctly. The real answer can be found in the URL.
    So, anyone noticed that graphics are getting so good that it's hard to tell real life from rendered worlds? What do you think will be next? Will we get to the point we already got with audio: there's basically no place we could advance further? What will we research then?
     
  2. Vigil

    Vigil New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    126
    Likes Received:
    0
    Fun.
     
  3. dub

    dub

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2002
    Messages:
    2,855
    Likes Received:
    0
    I disagree

    Well for one that picture isn't exactly large, so it's easier to be mistaken - which I wasn't, I will add.
    Post that picture at full resolution and it becomes even more obvious.
    That looks far from "real" to me. It looks like a game. (Also, I know Shangrila, so my first thought was "oh, Shangrila")
    Further, make someone watch the game being played at full res. and unless you have no clue about video games, there's absolutely no way it'd fool you into thinking it was real/a movie or whatever. Ergo there is still tons of work to be done in the visual department, when it comes to games.

    Games are moving towards visual realism, but we're still miles away. There is still so much more to be done in the way of real-time graphics that I'm pretty sure I'll be gone by the time anything comes out that will really make it hard to tell if it's a game or the real thing. :(
    I haven't played a game to date which is even teetering on "is this real - or is this a game?!"

    Every generation that brings new graphic prowess, is usually heralded as virtually indistinguishable from realism... until the next gen surfaces and you laugh at yourself for thinking that it was even close.
    When I first saw Crysis I was like :eek: amazing. Looking at it now... yeah it's still very nice, but not that impressive any more. In a couple of years, it too will just look dated and anybody who reckoned that it looked super life-like will probably find it amusing they did when compared Crysis 2017.

    Read real old gaming articles, where you'll find people back then were praising the graphics for looking "amazingly close to the real thing" when to us now, they look nothing like the real thing.
    I remember seeing games way-back-when thinking "man that's SO realistic"...

    Of course I am talking real-time here as there are architectural renders I've seen that are immensely hard to differentiate from a photo/film.
    But I've not played any game that even comes close to me not being able to distinguish it from a film.

    On the other hand my father visited me once, and I had my PC running with some game on it and he asked me what film it was. :)
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2009
  4. ambershee

    ambershee Nimbusfish Rawks

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,521
    Likes Received:
    7
    Lol, if anyone thinks that could be a photo, they need to get out more - it looks and feels very computer generated. But it could indeed be a render / still from a film.
     
  5. JohnDoe641

    JohnDoe641 Killer Fools Pro Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2000
    Messages:
    5,323
    Likes Received:
    49
    Indeed.

    Though I'll go a bit further and say that anyone who thinks that that is a photo is either close to blind or has some type of problem distinguishing reality. :/
     
  6. Phopojijo

    Phopojijo A Loose Screw

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,458
    Likes Received:
    0
    Reality is only dependent on how far away you are from the image.

    As computer graphics are getting more sophisticated, we're able to get closer and closer to an image and still look like it's "real" ((if stylized)).
     
  7. cosmix

    cosmix XoXo

    Joined:
    May 20, 2006
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    0
    Larrabee.
    Wait until 2010 and you will get this (nice) picture 10 times better in realtime. Cya NVIDIA and cya ATI...
     
  8. KillerSkaarj

    KillerSkaarj Art for swans is dope!

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    0
    See, I have a theory that all reality is is just a massively complex computer game run in a different reality. Eventually, the computer game strives to develop its own absolutely realistic games, who will in turn strive to make their OWN absolutely realistic game. It explains why the universe is tailored to be EXTREMELY precise so that everything can exist and not explode in a mass of charged particles.

    I call it the "Hyper-nerd Theory" :D
     
  9. Cowlike

    Cowlike New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    This corner of shangrila looks pretty nice doesn't it
    [SCREENSHOT]http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/7218/prettymap.png[/SCREENSHOT]
     
  10. GreatEmerald

    GreatEmerald Khnumhotep

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    1
    It would be, if not excessive bloom...
     
  11. Jordan L

    Jordan L New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    0
    The racing game GRID for PC has amazing visuals if you have a card that can run the game on High/Ultra settings. These screenshots lost some quality from hosting on photobucket, but their still pretty good. Ignore the crowd in the last photo, normally they react to whatever the car is doing but for some reason their not in the photo.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  12. N1ghtmare

    N1ghtmare Sweet Dreams

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    2,411
    Likes Received:
    12
    Static images from games always look nicer than in the actua game itself.
     
  13. Jordan L

    Jordan L New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    0
    That may be true for most games, but believe it or not, this particular racing game looks better full screen and in motion. You cant really see the true reflections, particles, smoke animations, and textures without it being in motion in game.
     
  14. Phopojijo

    Phopojijo A Loose Screw

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,458
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah... racing sims are about the easiest games to make look pretty. GT4 on the PS2 looks awesome in spite of it being a PS2 game...
     
  15. Beelzebud (Satanas)

    Beelzebud (Satanas) New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2003
    Messages:
    321
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hate to bring up another engine, but there are certain areas in Crysis that really look photo realistic. I guess it's not total blasphemy considering Mischa the Sled Dog works for them.
     
  16. Jordan L

    Jordan L New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Crysis Warhead looks pretty good, especially in the areas near the water. The game runs great to, Crytek optimized it good.
     
  17. GreatEmerald

    GreatEmerald Khnumhotep

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    1
    The racing game also has too much bloom, but pretty nice anyway. Especially the first picture.
     
  18. KillerSkaarj

    KillerSkaarj Art for swans is dope!

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    0
    HUH. I. WHAT. SINCE WHEN!?! I thought Myscha quit working on video games? Someone should go over there and blackmail Myscha to come back to Epic and help create Unreal 3 should it ever be conceived in the future XD. Or not. Whatever. But still, I think Crysis just got 100 times more awesome for me just because one of the original Unreal devs are now on the Crysis developing team. Too bad my computer can't even play games like Doom 3 thanks to the half-death of my 6200 (R.I.P).

    Oh yeah, and the reason Racing games look so good is because the game doesn't have that much to render. It only has to focus on the race track itself, and the cars themselves, ultimately allowing the devs to pump up the graphics with only little background objects. With increasing graphical power, however, FPS games are quickly reaching the threshold of Racing game graphics. Too bad the same thing is happening to the racing games as well. We're more likely to have photorealistic racing games before we finally have photorealistic FPS games.

    EDIT: Ok, we already have photorealistic racing games (except the cars look like toys...), we just need photorealistic FPS games. No, scratch that, we don't NEED photorealistic, we WANT photorealistic.

    Wait, why are we striving for photorealistic games anyway? Whatever happened to fun? Are we trying to do that because we can't do those things in real life (when do you think you'll ever fight an alien wielding a triple barrel rocket launcher with a plasma gun with a beam that fries your enemies and helps your friends?) and they want to make us feel that we are?
     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2009
  19. Dogger

    Dogger New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    0
    KillerSkaarj arguing with himself again :rolleyes:

    No hes not!

    Yes he is.
     
  20. Grobut

    Grobut Комиссар Гробут

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,822
    Likes Received:
    0
    We will get there eventually, yes, but there is much more to do for games, AI can definately be improved, even expand to include more wildlife and other such non-gameplay-critical AI, worlds can become bigger and more complex than they are, controls, use of camera and interfaces can become better, as can story telling, core gameplay and lots of other things..

    Actually it would be good for games when developers can nolonger push the visuals any further, as systems become more powerfull it would leave them lots of free system resources that can be used to make better physics, use more and better AI, larger worlds with less loading and so on.
     

Share This Page